Literature DB >> 18931131

Induction of the galactose enzymes in Escherichia coli is independent of the C-1-hydroxyl optical configuration of the inducer D-galactose.

Sang Jun Lee1, Dale E A Lewis, Sankar Adhya.   

Abstract

The two optical forms of aldohexose galactose differing at the C-1 position, alpha-D-galactose and beta-D-galactose, are widespread in nature. The two anomers also occur in di- and polysaccharides, as well as in glycoconjugates. The anomeric form of D-galactose, when present in complex carbohydrates, e.g., cell wall, glycoproteins, and glycolipids, is specific. Their interconversion occurs as monomers and is effected by the enzyme mutarotase (aldose-1-epimerase). Mutarotase and other D-galactose-metabolizing enzymes are coded by genes that constitute an operon in Escherichia coli. The operon is repressed by the repressor GalR and induced by D-galactose. Since, depending on the carbon source during growth, the cell can make only one of the two anomers of D-galactose, the cell must also convert one anomer to the other for use in specific biosynthetic pathways. Thus, it is imperative that induction of the gal operon, specifically the mutarotase, be achievable by either anomer of D-galactose. Here we report in vivo and in vitro experiments showing that both alpha-D-galactose and beta-D-galactose are capable of inducing transcription of the gal operon with equal efficiency and kinetics. Whereas all substitutions at the C-1 position in the alpha configuration inactivate the induction capacity of the sugar, the effect of substitutions in the beta configuration varies depending upon the nature of the substitution; methyl and phenyl derivatives induce weakly, but the glucosyl derivative does not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18931131      PMCID: PMC2593240          DOI: 10.1128/JB.01008-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  36 in total

1.  Role of HU and DNA supercoiling in transcription repression: specialized nucleoprotein repression complex at gal promoters in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  D E Lewis; M Geanacopoulos; S Adhya
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.501

2.  The enzymatic transformation of uridine diphosphate glucose into a galactose derivative.

Authors:  L F LELOIR
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1951-09       Impact factor: 4.013

3.  DNA looping in cellular repression of transcription of the galactose operon.

Authors:  N Mandal; W Su; R Haber; S Adhya; H Echols
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Repression and activation of promoter-bound RNA polymerase activity by Gal repressor.

Authors:  H E Choy; R R Hanger; T Aki; M Mahoney; K Murakami; A Ishihama; S Adhya
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-09-26       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Mutations that reduce expression from the P2 promoter of the Escherichia coli galactose operon.

Authors:  A H Bingham; S Ponnambalam; B Chan; S Busby
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.688

6.  Transcription regulation by inflexibility of promoter DNA in a looped complex.

Authors:  H E Choy; S W Park; P Parrack; S Adhya
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Dependence of lactose metabolism upon mutarotase encoded in the gal operon in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  G G Bouffard; K E Rudd; S L Adhya
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-12-02       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  The allosteric interaction between D-galactose and the Escherichia coli galactose repressor protein.

Authors:  M P Brown; N Shaikh; M Brenowitz; L Brand
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-04-29       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Gene disruption in Escherichia coli: TcR and KmR cassettes with the option of Flp-catalyzed excision of the antibiotic-resistance determinant.

Authors:  P P Cherepanov; W Wackernagel
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1995-05-26       Impact factor: 3.688

10.  Characterization of two mutations in the Escherichia coli galE gene inactivating the second galactose operator and comparative studies of repressor binding.

Authors:  H J Fritz; H Bicknäse; B Gleumes; C Heibach; S Rosahl; R Ehring
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cellular stress created by intermediary metabolite imbalances.

Authors:  Sang Jun Lee; Andrei Trostel; Phuoc Le; Rajendran Harinarayanan; Peter C Fitzgerald; Sankar Adhya
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Structure and function of the D-galactose network in enterobacteria.

Authors:  Zsolt Csiszovszki; Sandeep Krishna; László Orosz; Sankar Adhya; Szabolcs Semsey
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 7.867

Review 3.  Molecular Mechanisms of Transcription Initiation at gal Promoters and their Multi-Level Regulation by GalR, CRP and DNA Loop.

Authors:  Dale E A Lewis; Sankar Adhya
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2015-10-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.