Literature DB >> 18930440

Surgical management of failed pyeloplasty in children: single-center experience.

Tamer E Helmy1, Osama M Sarhan, Ashraf T Hafez, Mohamed T Elsherbiny, Mohamed E Dawaba, Ahmad M Ghali.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of secondary surgical procedures for the management of failed pyeloplasty in children.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2007, 590 cases of primary ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction underwent open dismembered pyeloplasty at our center. Of these patients, 18 (3%) with recurrent UPJ obstruction (14 males, 4 females; age range: 2-15 years) have undergone management of failed pyeloplasty. Secondary intervention was by open operative procedure in all cases. Clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed. Success was defined as both symptomatic relief and radiographic resolution of obstruction at last follow up.
RESULTS: Follow up ranged from 8 to 41 months (mean 28). The overall salvage rate was 89%. Secondary reoperative surgery was successful in 16 patients: dismembered pyeloplasty in 14 patients (78%) and ureterocalyceal anastomosis in 2 (11%). Nephrectomy was necessitated in 2 patients (11%). No perioperative complications were encountered. All patients showed stability of renal function on radiological follow up without evidence of obstruction and with no further symptoms.
CONCLUSION: Persistent UPJ obstruction after pyeloplasty is an uncommon complication. Secondary procedures have a very high success rate with excellent functional results. Nephrectomy is indicated in rare cases of severely deteriorated renal function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18930440     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  4 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance urography and laparoscopy in paediatric urology: a case series.

Authors:  Maria Beatrice Damasio; Sara Costanzo; Emilio Podestà; Gianmarco Ghiggeri; Giorgio Piaggio; Fabio Faranda; Maria Ludovica Degl'Innocenti; Vincenzo Jasonni; Gian Michele Magnano; Piero Buffa; Giovanni Montobbio; Girolamo Mattioli
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-07-31

2.  National Trends in Secondary Procedures Following Pediatric Pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Geolani W Dy; Ryan S Hsi; Sarah K Holt; Thomas S Lendvay; John L Gore; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Delayed redo pyeloplasty fails to recover lost renal function after failed pyeloplasty: early sonographic changes that correlate with a loss of differential renal function.

Authors:  Doo Yong Chung; Chang Hee Hong; Young Jae Im; Yong Seung Lee; Sang Woon Kim; Sang Won Han
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-01-30

4.  Optimal Length of Follow-up for the Detection of Unsuccessful Pediatric Pyeloplasty: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Utsav K Bansal; Pankaj P Dangle; Heidi Stephany; Asad Durrani; Glenn Cannon; Francis X Schneck; Michael C Ost
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.418

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.