Literature DB >> 18930218

Comparison of survival and embryonic development in human oocytes cryopreserved by slow-freezing and vitrification.

Yun-Xia Cao1, Qiong Xing, Li Li, Lin Cong, Zhi-Guo Zhang, Zhao-Lian Wei, Ping Zhou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the survival, fertilization, early embryonic development, and meiotic spindle assembly and chromosome alignment in frozen-thawed human oocytes after slow-freezing and vitrification.
DESIGN: A randomized study.
SETTING: A university-affiliated assisted reproductive center. PATIENT(S): Donated extra eggs from women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. INTERVENTION(S): A total of 605 mature oocytes were divided into a slow-freezing group and a vitrification group for cryopreservation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): After frozen-thawing, the oocyte survival rate, spindle assembly, and chromosome alignment were compared. The surviving oocytes were inseminated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and the rate of fertilization and embryo development were also compared in two groups. RESULT(S): The oocyte survival rate was statistically significantly lower in the slow-freezing group (75 out of 123, 61.0%) than the vitrification group (268 out of 292, 91.8%). The fertilization rate was the same for both groups, but the cleavage rate of zygotes was statistically significantly different between two groups: (slow-freezing, 25/46 (54.4%) versus vitrification, 142 out of 182 (78.0%). There was a considerable difference in the percentage of high-quality embryos between slow-freezing and vitrification groups: 6 out of 25 (24.0%) versus 60 out of 142 (42.3%), respectively. The percentage of blastocyst development was statistically significantly higher in the vitrification group (47 out of 60, 33.1%) than in the slow-freezing group (3 out of 25, 12.0%). There was a much higher percentage of oocyte abnormalities in terms of spindle assembly and chromosome alignment in the slow-freezing group (25 out of 64, 39.1%) compared with the vitrification group (11 out of 62, 17.7%). CONCLUSION(S): Vitrification is superior to the slow-freezing method, leading to improved oocyte survival rate, fertilization, and embryonic development in vitro. These results may be related to vitrified human oocytes incurring less damage to spindle integrity and chromosome alignment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18930218     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  32 in total

1.  Human cleavage-stage embryo vitrification is comparable to slow-rate cryopreservation in cycles of assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Martin Graham Wilding; Clemente Capobianco; Nadia Montanaro; Genc Kabili; Loredana Di Matteo; Enrico Fusco; Brian Dale
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  The mammalian ovary from genesis to revelation.

Authors:  Mark A Edson; Ankur K Nagaraja; Martin M Matzuk
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 19.871

3.  Effects of duration of cryo-storage of mouse oocytes on cryo-survival, fertilization and embryonic development following vitrification.

Authors:  Jie Yan; Joao Suzuki; Xiao-Min Yu; Jie Qiao; Frederick W K Kan; Ri-Cheng Chian
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Exposing mouse oocytes to necrostatin 1 during in vitro maturation improves maturation, survival after vitrification, mitochondrial preservation, and developmental competence.

Authors:  Jun Woo Jo; Jung Ryeol Lee; Byung Chul Jee; Chang Suk Suh; Seok Hyun Kim
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.060

5.  Survival and post-warming in vitro competence of human oocytes after high security closed system vitrification.

Authors:  N De Munck; G Verheyen; L Van Landuyt; D Stoop; H Van de Velde
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Recent advances in the field of ovarian tissue cryopreservation and opportunities for research.

Authors:  Camille Ladanyi; Amir Mor; Mindy S Christianson; Namisha Dhillon; James H Segars
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Vitrification of embryos and oocytes for fertility preservation in cancer patients.

Authors:  Keiichi Kato
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2016-02-29

8.  Maturation outcomes are improved following Cryoleaf vitrification of immature human oocytes when compared to choline-based slow-freezing.

Authors:  Catherine M H Combelles; S Temel Ceyhan; Haiyan Wang; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Effects of vitrification and cryostorage duration on single-cell RNA-Seq profiling of vitrified-thawed human metaphase II oocytes.

Authors:  Ying Huo; Peng Yuan; Qingyuan Qin; Zhiqiang Yan; Liying Yan; Ping Liu; Rong Li; Jie Yan; Jie Qiao
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 4.592

10.  The growth and development conditions in mouse offspring derived from ovarian tissue cryopreservation and orthotopic transplantation.

Authors:  Zhe Yan; Qing Li; Long Zhang; Beijia Kang; Wei Fan; Tang Deng; Jiang Zhu; Yan Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.