Literature DB >> 18930100

Levofloxacin rescues mice from lethal intra-nasal infections with virulent Francisella tularensis and induces immunity and production of protective antibody.

Gary R Klimpel1, Tonyia Eaves-Pyles, Scott T Moen, Joanna Taormina, Johnny W Peterson, Ashok K Chopra, David W Niesel, Paige Carness, Judith L Haithcoat, Michelle Kirtley, Abdelhakim Ben Nasr.   

Abstract

The ability to protect mice against respiratory infections with virulent Francisella tularensis has been problematic and the role of antibody-versus-cell-mediated immunity controversial. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that protective immunity can develop in mice that were given antibiotic therapy following infection via the respiratory tract with F. tularensis SCHU S4. We show that mice infected with a lethal dose of SCHU S4, via an intra-nasal challenge, could be protected with levofloxacin treatment. This protection was evident even when levofloxacin treatment was delayed 72h post-infection. At early time points after levofloxacin treatment, significant numbers of bacteria could be recovered from the lungs and spleens of mice, which was followed by a dramatic disappearance of bacteria from these tissues. Mice successfully treated with levofloxacin were later shown to be almost completely resistant to re-challenge with SCHU S4 by the intra-nasal route. Serum antibody appeared to play an important role in this immunity. Normal mice, when given sera from animals protected by levofloxacin treatment, were solidly protected from a lethal intra-nasal challenge with SCHU S4. The protective antiserum contained high titers of SCHU S4-specific IgG2a, indicating that a strong Th1 response was induced following levofloxacin treatment. Thus, this study describes a potentially valuable animal model for furthering our understanding of respiratory tularemia and provides suggestive evidence that antibody can protect against respiratory infections with virulent F. tularensis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18930100      PMCID: PMC2630585          DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.09.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  54 in total

1.  Treatment of tularemia with levofloxacin.

Authors:  E A Aranda
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 8.067

2.  Aerogenic immunization of the monkey and guinea pig with live tularemia vaccine.

Authors:  H T EIGELSBACH; J J TULIS; E L OVERHOLT; W R GRIFFITH
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1961-12

Review 3.  Tularemia.

Authors:  R F Jacobs
Journal:  Adv Pediatr Infect Dis       Date:  1996

4.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for immunological diagnosis of human tularemia.

Authors:  H E Carlsson; A A Lindberg; G Lindberg; B Hederstedt; K A Karlsson; B O Agell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Aerosol-, but not intradermal-immunization with the live vaccine strain of Francisella tularensis protects mice against subsequent aerosol challenge with a highly virulent type A strain of the pathogen by an alphabeta T cell- and interferon gamma- dependent mechanism.

Authors:  J Wayne Conlan; Hua Shen; Rhonda Kuolee; Xigeng Zhao; Wangxue Chen
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Experimental tularemia in mice challenged by aerosol or intradermally with virulent strains of Francisella tularensis: bacteriologic and histopathologic studies.

Authors:  J Wayne Conlan; Wangxue Chen; Hua Shen; Ann Webb; Rhonda KuoLee
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Passive protection of mice against lethal Francisella tularensis (live tularemia vaccine strain) infection by the sera of human recipients of the live tularemia vaccine.

Authors:  J J Drabick; R B Narayanan; J C Williams; J W Leduc; C A Nacy
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.378

8.  Role of lipopolysaccharide and a major outer membrane protein from Francisella tularensis in the induction of immunity against tularemia.

Authors:  M Fulop; R Manchee; R Titball
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Cellular fatty acid composition of Francisella tularensis.

Authors:  E Jantzen; B P Berdal; T Omland
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  An improved Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain (LVS) is well tolerated and highly immunogenic when administered to rabbits in escalating doses using various immunization routes.

Authors:  Marcela F Pasetti; Lilian Cuberos; Thomas L Horn; Jeffry D Shearer; Stephen J Matthews; Robert V House; Marcelo B Sztein
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 3.641

View more
  32 in total

1.  Antibodies contribute to effective vaccination against respiratory infection by type A Francisella tularensis strains.

Authors:  Gopi Mara-Koosham; Julie A Hutt; C Rick Lyons; Terry H Wu
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Fc receptor-targeting of immunogen as a strategy for enhanced antigen loading, vaccination, and protection using intranasally administered antigen-pulsed dendritic cells.

Authors:  Giang H Pham; Bibiana V Iglesias; Edmund J Gosselin
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Bioavailability and efficacy of levofloxacin against Francisella tularensis in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Michelle Nelson; Mark S Lever; Rachel E Dean; Peter C Pearce; Daniel J Stevens; Andrew J H Simpson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Antibodies to both terminal and internal B-cell epitopes of Francisella tularensis O-polysaccharide produced by patients with tularemia.

Authors:  Zhaohua Lu; Hillary M Perkins; Jacqueline Sharon
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2013-12-18

5.  Identification of Francisella tularensis outer membrane protein A (FopA) as a protective antigen for tularemia.

Authors:  Anthony J Hickey; Karsten R O Hazlett; Girish S Kirimanjeswara; Dennis W Metzger
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Vaccination by delayed treatment of infection.

Authors:  Sean P Stromberg; Rustom Antia
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Targeting the "Rising DAMP" during a Francisella tularensis Infection.

Authors:  Riccardo V D'Elia; Thomas R Laws; Alun Carter; Roman Lukaszewski; Graeme C Clark
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Mucosal immunotherapy for protection from pneumonic infection with Francisella tularensis.

Authors:  Ryan M Troyer; Katie L Propst; Jeff Fairman; Catherine M Bosio; Steven W Dow
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Functional and structural characterization of Francisella tularensis O-antigen antibodies at the low end of antigen reactivity.

Authors:  Zhaohua Lu; Michael J Rynkiewicz; Chiou-Ying Yang; Guillermo Madico; Hillary M Perkins; Marly I Roche; Barbara A Seaton; Jacqueline Sharon
Journal:  Monoclon Antib Immunodiagn Immunother       Date:  2014-08

10.  A Bioluminescent Francisella tularensis SCHU S4 Strain Enables Noninvasive Tracking of Bacterial Dissemination and the Evaluation of Antibiotics in an Inhalational Mouse Model of Tularemia.

Authors:  Charlotte A Hall; Helen C Flick-Smith; Sarah V Harding; Helen S Atkins; Richard W Titball
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.