Literature DB >> 18929417

Foot and mouth disease virus transmission during the incubation period of the disease in piglets, lambs, calves, and dairy cows.

K Orsel1, A Bouma, A Dekker, J A Stegeman, M C M de Jong.   

Abstract

Transmission of foot and mouth disease (FMD) virus by infected animals may already occur before clinical signs are evident. Quantitative data for FMD transmission rates during this so-called high-risk period are currently lacking and would provide useful information to develop surveillance systems in which the number of new outbreaks is an outcome variable. In order to address this, we used experimental data to quantify transmission in cattle, swine and sheep during the non-clinical phase of the disease. Groups consisted of vaccinated or non-vaccinated animals of one species; half of each group was inoculated with FMDV, the other half was contact-exposed. We estimated the reproduction ratio R(nonclin) using a mathematical SIR model. R(nonclin) was defined as the average number of secondary infections caused by one infectious individual in its non-clinical phase. Animals not showing clinical signs shed lower amounts of virus than clinically affected ones. Therefore, we estimated transmission proportionally to the virus excretion. Low estimates for R(nonclin) in groups with non-vaccinated and vaccinated calves; 0.30 [0.03; 3.43] and 1.03x10(-8) [0; infinity] respectively and 0.21 [0.02; 2.48] for the non-vaccinated and 0.16 [0.009; 2.96] for the vaccinated lambs, were observed. These results indicate that only few secondary infections are to be expected from infected calves and lambs when they are not clinically affected. In groups of non-vaccinated piglets estimates were R(nonclin)=13.20 [4.08; 42.68], and in vaccinated piglets R(nonclin)=1.26 [0.18; 8.96]. The estimate for R(nonclin) for non-vaccinated dairy cows was R(nonclin)=176.65 [80.38; 388.24], whereas R(nonclin) in the vaccinated groups could not be estimated. Our findings suggest that a large number of individuals might have been infected before clinical signs are noticed, especially in non-vaccinated swine and dairy herds. These findings suggest that after clinical recognition of FMD, priority should be given to trace back contacts with swine and dairy farms, as they may already have been infectious in the herd's incubation period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18929417     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  18 in total

1.  Relationship between clinical signs and transmission of an infectious disease and the implications for control.

Authors:  Bryan Charleston; Bartlomies M Bankowski; Simon Gubbins; Margo E Chase-Topping; David Schley; Richard Howey; Paul V Barnett; Debi Gibson; Nicholas D Juleff; Mark E J Woolhouse
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Redefining the "carrier" state for foot-and-mouth disease from the dynamics of virus persistence in endemically affected cattle populations.

Authors:  Barend M deC Bronsvoort; Ian G Handel; Charles K Nfon; Karl-Johan Sørensen; Viviana Malirat; Ingrid Bergmann; Vincent N Tanya; Kenton L Morgan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The effect of life history on retroviral genome invasions.

Authors:  Ravinder K Kanda; Tim Coulson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Quantification of transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus caused by an environment contaminated with secretions and excretions from infected calves.

Authors:  Carla Bravo de Rueda; Mart C M de Jong; Phaedra L Eblé; Aldo Dekker
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.683

5.  A Comparative Assessment of the Risks of Introduction and Spread of Foot-and-Mouth Disease among Different Pig Sectors in Australia.

Authors:  Marta Hernández-Jover; Nicole Schembri; Patricia K Holyoake; Jenny-Ann L M L Toribio; Peter Anthony Julian Martin
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-09-22

6.  Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus-Associated Abortion and Vertical Transmission following Acute Infection in Cattle under Natural Conditions.

Authors:  Rajeev Ranjan; Jitendra K Biswal; Saravanan Subramaniam; Karam Pal Singh; Carolina Stenfeldt; Luis L Rodriguez; Bramhadev Pattnaik; Jonathan Arzt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Transmission of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus during the Incubation Period in Pigs.

Authors:  Carolina Stenfeldt; Juan M Pacheco; Barbara P Brito; Karla I Moreno-Torres; Matt A Branan; Amy H Delgado; Luis L Rodriguez; Jonathan Arzt
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-11-21

8.  Predicting the Ability of Preclinical Diagnosis To Improve Control of Farm-to-Farm Foot-and-Mouth Disease Transmission in Cattle.

Authors:  Noel Nelson; David J Paton; Simon Gubbins; Claire Colenutt; Emma Brown; Sophia Hodgson; Jose L Gonzales
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  The evolution of a super-swarm of foot-and-mouth disease virus in cattle.

Authors:  Jonathan Arzt; Ian Fish; Steven J Pauszek; Shannon L Johnson; Patrick S Chain; Devendra K Rai; Elizabeth Rieder; Tony L Goldberg; Luis L Rodriguez; Carolina Stenfeldt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Quantitative impacts of incubation phase transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus.

Authors:  Jonathan Arzt; Matthew A Branan; Amy H Delgado; Shankar Yadav; Karla I Moreno-Torres; Michael J Tildesley; Carolina Stenfeldt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.