OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects on motor function and impairment of mobilization and tactile stimulation for the paretic arm and hand after stroke. DESIGN: Replicated single-system series, ABA design. SETTING: The stroke rehabilitation ward of a community hospital in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample, men and women (N=6) with stroke (left or right), within 3 months of onset. INTERVENTION: Sixty minutes of daily mobilization and tactile stimulation to the paretic arm and hand for 6 weeks in addition to the usual rehabilitation program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Focal disability (Action Research Arm Test [ARAT]) and motor impairment (Motricity Index arm section). RESULTS: All participants showed visual change in 1 or more of trend, level, or slope between baseline and intervention phases for both the ARAT and the Motricity Index. The visual analysis was confirmed through statistical testing (c statistic and/or Mann-Whitney U test) for 5 of 6 participants (statistical analysis was precluded for 1 participant). No further improvements were made on intervention withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows proof of concept for using mobilization and tactile stimulation to improve motor recovery after severe paresis, justifying conducting dose-finding studies as a precursor to multicenter phase III clinical trials.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects on motor function and impairment of mobilization and tactile stimulation for the paretic arm and hand after stroke. DESIGN: Replicated single-system series, ABA design. SETTING: The stroke rehabilitation ward of a community hospital in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample, men and women (N=6) with stroke (left or right), within 3 months of onset. INTERVENTION: Sixty minutes of daily mobilization and tactile stimulation to the paretic arm and hand for 6 weeks in addition to the usual rehabilitation program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Focal disability (Action Research Arm Test [ARAT]) and motor impairment (Motricity Index arm section). RESULTS: All participants showed visual change in 1 or more of trend, level, or slope between baseline and intervention phases for both the ARAT and the Motricity Index. The visual analysis was confirmed through statistical testing (c statistic and/or Mann-Whitney U test) for 5 of 6 participants (statistical analysis was precluded for 1 participant). No further improvements were made on intervention withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows proof of concept for using mobilization and tactile stimulation to improve motor recovery after severe paresis, justifying conducting dose-finding studies as a precursor to multicenter phase III clinical trials.
Authors: Laia Sallés; Patricia Martín-Casas; Xavier Gironès; María José Durà; José Vicente Lafuente; Carlo Perfetti Journal: J Phys Ther Sci Date: 2017-04-20
Authors: Susan M Hunter; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Nick Ward; Niamh C Kennedy; Elizabeth Chandler; Christopher John Weir; John Rothwell; Alan M Wing; Michael J Grey; Garry Barton; Nick Malachy Leavey; Claire Havis; Roger N Lemon; Jane Burridge; Amy Dymond; Valerie M Pomeroy Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 4.003