OBJECTIVE: To develop and implement a service model for people with spinal cord injury (SCI) living in rural regions. DESIGN: Service development, pilot evaluation study. SETTING: Regional and remote areas of the state of New South Wales, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Persons with SCI, caregivers, and health professionals. INTERVENTION: Phase 1 included initial needs analysis, followed by education and resource development tailored to needs of rural health professionals, caregivers, and persons with SCI. Phase 2 included coordination, professional support, and network development by part-time rural key worker and metropolitan-based project officer, documenting health- and service-related issues. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-perception of confidence as a result of education as well as reported issues, adverse health events, and barriers to service provision. RESULTS: Clinician confidence in managing people with SCI improved after education. Various health-related, environmental, and psychosocial issues were reported. Limited availability of resources and health infrastructure, particularly in more isolated or smaller towns, challenged service provision. Rural key workers played a central role in supporting local clinicians and service providers, improving communication and service coordination between rural health professionals and metropolitan SCI services. CONCLUSION: Education and support for rural workforce that may be limited in numbers and capacity, and a model facilitating communication and coordination between services, are essential for improving health outcomes of rural people with SCI.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and implement a service model for people with spinal cord injury (SCI) living in rural regions. DESIGN: Service development, pilot evaluation study. SETTING: Regional and remote areas of the state of New South Wales, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Persons with SCI, caregivers, and health professionals. INTERVENTION: Phase 1 included initial needs analysis, followed by education and resource development tailored to needs of rural health professionals, caregivers, and persons with SCI. Phase 2 included coordination, professional support, and network development by part-time rural key worker and metropolitan-based project officer, documenting health- and service-related issues. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-perception of confidence as a result of education as well as reported issues, adverse health events, and barriers to service provision. RESULTS: Clinician confidence in managing people with SCI improved after education. Various health-related, environmental, and psychosocial issues were reported. Limited availability of resources and health infrastructure, particularly in more isolated or smaller towns, challenged service provision. Rural key workers played a central role in supporting local clinicians and service providers, improving communication and service coordination between rural health professionals and metropolitan SCI services. CONCLUSION: Education and support for rural workforce that may be limited in numbers and capacity, and a model facilitating communication and coordination between services, are essential for improving health outcomes of rural people with SCI.
Authors: Elias Ronca; Thekla Brunkert; Hans Georg Koch; Xavier Jordan; Armin Gemperli Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: B Catharine Craven; S Mohammad Alavinia; Matheus J Wiest; Farnoosh Farahani; Sander L Hitzig; Heather Flett; Gaya Jeyathevan; Maryam Omidvar; Mark T Bayley Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 1.985