Literature DB >> 18928850

Antimicrobial efficacy of two irrigation techniques in tapered and nontapered canal preparations: an in vitro study.

Jeffrey L Hockett1, Johanna K Dommisch2, James D Johnson3, Nestor Cohenca4.   

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to determine whether irrigation with apical negative pressure was more effective than traditional positive-pressure irrigation in eradicating Enterococcus faecalis from preshaped root canals. Fifty-four extracted mandibular molars were instrumented to produce either a non-tapered or tapered preparation, sterilized, inoculated with E. faecalis for 30 days, and then randomly assigned into the following groups: group 1--non-tapered preparation and negative-pressure irrigation, group 2--non-tapered preparation and positive-pressure irrigation, group 3--tapered preparation and positive-pressure irrigation, and group 4--tapered preparation and negative-pressure irrigation. Mesial canals were sampled before and after final irrigation and samples incubated aerobically for 48 hours at 37 degrees C. Scanning electron microscopic analysis confirmed dense bacterial colonies in the positive control, consistent with biofilm formation. A statistically significant difference was evident when comparing apical negative-pressure irrigation to positive-pressure irrigation (p=0.004). There was no statistically significant difference in colony-forming units (CFUs) between sizes #35 and #45, nor between tapered and non-tapered preparation. The results of this in vitro study showed that apical negative-pressure irrigation has the potential to achieve better microbial control than traditional irrigation delivery systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18928850     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  10 in total

Review 1.  Pressure alteration techniques in endodontics- a review of literature.

Authors:  Shinam Kapila Pasricha; Sameer Makkar; Pranav Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-03-01

2.  A comparison between two negative pressure irrigation techniques in simulated immature tooth: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Ahmed Jamleh; Yasue Fukumoto; Yoshioka Takatomo; Chihiro Kobayashi; Hideaki Suda; Carlos G Adorno
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Temperature evolution of preheated irrigant injected into a root canal ex vivo.

Authors:  Ricardo G Macedo; Bram Verhaagen; Michel Versluis; Luc van der Sluis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Multivariate analysis of the cleaning efficacy of different final irrigation techniques in the canal and isthmus of mandibular posterior teeth.

Authors:  Yeon-Jee Yoo; Woocheol Lee; Hyeon-Cheol Kim; Won-Jun Shon; Seung-Ho Baek
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2013-08-23

5.  Comparative evaluation of debris removal from root canal wall by using EndoVac and conventional needle irrigation: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Vandana J Gade; Shweta K Sedani; Jyoti S Lokade; Leena D Belsare; Jaykumar R Gade
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2013-10

6.  An in vitro comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of positive pressure and negative pressure irrigation techniques in root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Tarun Kumar; Jaidev Singh Dhillon; Gurdeep Singh Gill; Rakesh Singla; Shweta Rani; Mannat Dhillon
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug

7.  A Regenerative Approach for Root Canal Treatment of Mature Permanent Teeth: Comparative Evaluation with 18 Months Follow-up.

Authors:  Preeti Jha; Mandeep S Virdi; Suman Nain
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2019 May-Jun

Review 8.  Overview on the current antibiotic containing agents used in endodontics.

Authors:  Ramta Bansal; Aditya Jain
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2014-08

9.  Apical Negative Pressure irrigation presents tissue compatibility in immature teeth.

Authors:  Carolina Maschietto Pucinelli; Léa Assed Bezerra da Silva; Nestor Cohenca; Priscilla Coutinho Romualdo; Raquel Assed Bezerra da Silva; Alberto Consolaro; Alexandra Mussolino de Queiroz; Paulo Nelson
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 10.  Present status and future directions - irrigants and irrigation methods.

Authors:  Christos Boutsioukis; Maria Teresa Arias-Moliz
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 5.165

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.