V E V Rullo1, A Segato, A Kirsh, D Sole. 1. Department of Pediatrics. Federal University of São Paulo-Escola Paulista de Medicina. São Paulo. Brasil. alergia.reumato@terra.com.br
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory pruritic skin heterogeneous disease, which does not have an objective tool able to permit comparison between patients and to monitor changes due to a specific treatment. Several assessment methods have been developed to evaluate the AD. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the agreement between two observers in the assessment of the severity of AD applying SCORAD index and EASI in infants and young children with AD. The variations of parameters that compose each score, as well as the inter-observer variation for both scores, were also studied. METHODS: We evaluated 42 infants and young children admitted and followed in a paediatric allergy centre (UNIFESP-EPM). All children met the diagnostic criteria for clinical AD established by Hanifin and Rajka. Two investigators graded the severity of AD, applying the SCORAD index and EASI. The two scoring systems assessed the variation between baseline evaluation and one month after treatment. RESULTS: Significant correlations were observed comparing both scores for each physician and each evaluation. There were no differences between the mean SCORAD and EASI scores for each physician, in the two evaluations. There was a significant decrease in the mean total SCORAD and EASI score and its components, except for the item Upper Extremities EASI CONCLUSION: Both scoring systems for AD are valid, reproducible and responsive in monitoring AD patients. Further studies will be necessary to investigate the development of AD and the best evaluation. SCORAD showed itself to be an excellent score to detect the development of AD, whereas the EASI are suitable to follow up in drug-effect studies of AD for research purposes.
BACKGROUND:Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory pruritic skin heterogeneous disease, which does not have an objective tool able to permit comparison between patients and to monitor changes due to a specific treatment. Several assessment methods have been developed to evaluate the AD. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the agreement between two observers in the assessment of the severity of AD applying SCORAD index and EASI in infants and young children with AD. The variations of parameters that compose each score, as well as the inter-observer variation for both scores, were also studied. METHODS: We evaluated 42 infants and young children admitted and followed in a paediatric allergy centre (UNIFESP-EPM). All children met the diagnostic criteria for clinical AD established by Hanifin and Rajka. Two investigators graded the severity of AD, applying the SCORAD index and EASI. The two scoring systems assessed the variation between baseline evaluation and one month after treatment. RESULTS: Significant correlations were observed comparing both scores for each physician and each evaluation. There were no differences between the mean SCORAD and EASI scores for each physician, in the two evaluations. There was a significant decrease in the mean total SCORAD and EASI score and its components, except for the item Upper Extremities EASI CONCLUSION: Both scoring systems for AD are valid, reproducible and responsive in monitoring ADpatients. Further studies will be necessary to investigate the development of AD and the best evaluation. SCORAD showed itself to be an excellent score to detect the development of AD, whereas the EASI are suitable to follow up in drug-effect studies of AD for research purposes.
Authors: Mark G Lebwohl; James Q Del Rosso; William Abramovits; Brian Berman; David E Cohen; Emma Guttman; Anthony J Mancini; Lawrence A Schachner Journal: J Clin Aesthet Dermatol Date: 2013-07
Authors: Lawrence F Eichenfield; Wynnis L Tom; Sarah L Chamlin; Steven R Feldman; Jon M Hanifin; Eric L Simpson; Timothy G Berger; James N Bergman; David E Cohen; Kevin D Cooper; Kelly M Cordoro; Dawn M Davis; Alfons Krol; David J Margolis; Amy S Paller; Kathryn Schwarzenberger; Robert A Silverman; Hywel C Williams; Craig A Elmets; Julie Block; Christopher G Harrod; Wendy Smith Begolka; Robert Sidbury Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Mark Jean-Ann Koh; Yoke Chin Giam; Hui Min Liew; Alice Yee-Wah Foong; Jin Ho Chong; Sharon Mun Yee Wong; Mark Boon Yang Tang; Madeline Sheun Ling Ho; Lucinda Siyun Tan; James M Mason; Michael J Cork Journal: Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) Date: 2017-06-14
Authors: Yong Hyun Jang; Hyun Bo Sim; Sun Young Moon; Weon Ju Lee; Seok-Jong Lee; Meiling Jin; Sang-Hyun Kim; Do Won Kim Journal: Ann Dermatol Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 1.444
Authors: Trisha Kaundinya; Uros Rakita; Armaan Guraya; Donna Maria Abboud; Emily Croce; Jacob P Thyssen; Andrew Alexis; Jonathan I Silverberg Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 8.551