AIMS: the goal of this study was to estimate the prevalence of diabetes through record linkage of various data sources in four Italian areas. SETTING: Aulss 12 Veneziana, Aulss 4 Alto vicentino, Torino, ASL10 of Firenze. PARTICIPANTS: all 2002 to 2004 residents in the four areas (n = 2,123,913 on 30th June 2003). MAIN OUTCOME: crude prevalence by age and gender and standardized prevalence by gender. METHODS: we used three different data sources. The first was the set of files of all persons discharged from hospitals with a primary or secondary diagnosis of diabetes (ICD-9-CM code 250*) in the year of interest or in the four previous years. The second data source was the set of files of all prescriptions of antidiabetic drugs (ATC code: A10A* and A10B*) prescribed in the year of interest; we considered as persons with diabetes only those who had at least two prescriptions of antidiabetic drugs at two different times. The third source was the set of files of all subjects who obtained exemption from payment of drugs or laboratory testing due to a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in the year of interest or in the 3 previous years. All data sources were matched by a deterministic linkage procedure. We defined as "prevalent case" those persons who were present in at least one of the three data sources. We compared the estimated prevalence in the four different areas. RESULTS: in 2003, the prevalence of diabetes in the four areas ranged from 3.93% to 5.55% among men, and from 3.55% to 4.52% among women. After adjustment for age, differences among men were reduced and were no longer present among women. Prevalence is higher among the elderly and among men. CONCLUSIONS: using routinely collected data we were able to identify large cohorts of persons with known diabetes and to estimate the prevalence of the disease, which was shown to be highly homogeneous among participating centres, and similar to that reported in other studies conducted in Italy with more costly and time consuming methods.
AIMS: the goal of this study was to estimate the prevalence of diabetes through record linkage of various data sources in four Italian areas. SETTING: Aulss 12 Veneziana, Aulss 4 Alto vicentino, Torino, ASL10 of Firenze. PARTICIPANTS: all 2002 to 2004 residents in the four areas (n = 2,123,913 on 30th June 2003). MAIN OUTCOME: crude prevalence by age and gender and standardized prevalence by gender. METHODS: we used three different data sources. The first was the set of files of all persons discharged from hospitals with a primary or secondary diagnosis of diabetes (ICD-9-CM code 250*) in the year of interest or in the four previous years. The second data source was the set of files of all prescriptions of antidiabetic drugs (ATC code: A10A* and A10B*) prescribed in the year of interest; we considered as persons with diabetes only those who had at least two prescriptions of antidiabetic drugs at two different times. The third source was the set of files of all subjects who obtained exemption from payment of drugs or laboratory testing due to a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in the year of interest or in the 3 previous years. All data sources were matched by a deterministic linkage procedure. We defined as "prevalent case" those persons who were present in at least one of the three data sources. We compared the estimated prevalence in the four different areas. RESULTS: in 2003, the prevalence of diabetes in the four areas ranged from 3.93% to 5.55% among men, and from 3.55% to 4.52% among women. After adjustment for age, differences among men were reduced and were no longer present among women. Prevalence is higher among the elderly and among men. CONCLUSIONS: using routinely collected data we were able to identify large cohorts of persons with known diabetes and to estimate the prevalence of the disease, which was shown to be highly homogeneous among participating centres, and similar to that reported in other studies conducted in Italy with more costly and time consuming methods.
Authors: Silvia Cascini; Nera Agabiti; Marina Davoli; Luigi Uccioli; Marco Meloni; Laura Giurato; Claudia Marino; Anna Maria Bargagli Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2020-07