Literature DB >> 18927542

Determinants of negative white-coat effect in treated hypertensive patients: the Jichi Morning Hypertension Research (J-MORE) study.

Tomoyuki Kabutoya1, Joji Ishikawa, Satoshi Hoshide, Kazuo Eguchi, Shizukiyo Ishikawa, Kazuyuki Shimada, Kazuomi Kario.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The negative white-coat effect (WCE), a phenomenon in which out-of-office blood pressure (BP) is higher than clinic BP, has not been well examined, unlike the WCE.
METHODS: As part of the Jichi Morning Hypertension Research study, in which clinic and home BP were measured in 969 hypertensive outpatients, 405 patients with normal clinic BP were separately analyzed. Clinic BP was measured on two different occasions, and home BP was measured twice in the morning and twice in the evening for three consecutive days. Clinic and home BP were each averaged from all readings, and negative WCE was defined as clinic systolic BP (SBP) lower than home SBP.
RESULTS: Negative WCE was observed in 324 (33%) of the patients overall and in 173 (42%) of the patients with controlled BP (clinic BP < 140/90 mm Hg). In multiple logistic regression analysis adjusting for covariates including home SBP and pulse rate, negative WCE was correlated with older age (odds ratio (OR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.06) and male gender (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.14) in overall subjects. Among patients with well-controlled clinic BP, negative WCE was significantly correlated with the presence of ischemic heart disease (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04-1.31). The association of negative WCE with age and male gender remained significant under stringent criteria (negative WCE < -10.2 mm Hg (the mean -1 s.d.)).
CONCLUSIONS: Negative WCE remaining even after clinic BP is controlled may be related to cardiovascular risk factors such as older age, male gender, and a history of ischemic heart disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18927542     DOI: 10.1038/ajh.2008.304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  3 in total

1.  Blood pressure cutoffs for white-coat and masked effects in a large population undergoing home blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Audes D M Feitosa; Marco A Mota-Gomes; Weimar S Barroso; Roberto D Miranda; Eduardo C D Barbosa; Rodrigo P Pedrosa; Paula C Oliveira; Camila L D M Feitosa; Andréa A Brandão; José L Lima-Filho; Andrei C Sposito; Antonio Coca; Wilson Nadruz
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.872

2.  A home blood pressure monitor equipped with a graphic function facilitates faster blood pressure control than the conventional home blood pressure monitor.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Kabutoya; Joji Ishikawa; Satoshi Hoshide; Kazuo Eguchi; Kazuyuki Shimada; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Differences between clinic blood pressure and morning home blood pressure, as shown by Bland-Altman plots, in a large observational study (HONEST study).

Authors:  Kazuyuki Shimada; Kazuomi Kario; Toshio Kushiro; Satoshi Teramukai; Yusuke Ishikawa; Fumiaki Kobayashi; Ikuo Saito
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.872

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.