BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Brain computer interfaces (BCIs) offer little direct benefit to patients with hemispheric stroke because current platforms rely on signals derived from the contralateral motor cortex (the same region injured by the stroke). For BCIs to assist hemiparetic patients, the implant must use unaffected cortex ipsilateral to the affected limb. This requires the identification of distinct electrophysiological features from the motor cortex associated with ipsilateral hand movements. METHODS: In this study we studied 6 patients undergoing temporary placement of intracranial electrode arrays. Electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals were recorded while the subjects engaged in specific ipsilateral or contralateral hand motor tasks. Spectral changes were identified with regards to frequency, location, and timing. RESULTS: Ipsilateral hand movements were associated with electrophysiological changes that occur in lower frequency spectra, at distinct anatomic locations, and earlier than changes associated with contralateral hand movements. In a subset of 3 patients, features specific to ipsilateral and contralateral hand movements were used to control a cursor on a screen in real time. In ipsilateral derived control this was optimal with lower frequency spectra. CONCLUSIONS: There are distinctive cortical electrophysiological features associated with ipsilateral movements which can be used for device control. These findings have implications for patients with hemispheric stroke because they offer a potential methodology for which a single hemisphere can be used to enhance the function of a stroke induced hemiparesis.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Brain computer interfaces (BCIs) offer little direct benefit to patients with hemispheric stroke because current platforms rely on signals derived from the contralateral motor cortex (the same region injured by the stroke). For BCIs to assist hemiparetic patients, the implant must use unaffected cortex ipsilateral to the affected limb. This requires the identification of distinct electrophysiological features from the motor cortex associated with ipsilateral hand movements. METHODS: In this study we studied 6 patients undergoing temporary placement of intracranial electrode arrays. Electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals were recorded while the subjects engaged in specific ipsilateral or contralateral hand motor tasks. Spectral changes were identified with regards to frequency, location, and timing. RESULTS:Ipsilateral hand movements were associated with electrophysiological changes that occur in lower frequency spectra, at distinct anatomic locations, and earlier than changes associated with contralateral hand movements. In a subset of 3 patients, features specific to ipsilateral and contralateral hand movements were used to control a cursor on a screen in real time. In ipsilateral derived control this was optimal with lower frequency spectra. CONCLUSIONS: There are distinctive cortical electrophysiological features associated with ipsilateral movements which can be used for device control. These findings have implications for patients with hemispheric stroke because they offer a potential methodology for which a single hemisphere can be used to enhance the function of a stroke induced hemiparesis.
Authors: Helen N Schwerdt; Wencheng Xu; Sameer Shekhar; Abbas Abbaspour-Tamijani; Bruce C Towe; Félix A Miranda; Junseok Chae Journal: J Microelectromech Syst Date: 2011-10-01 Impact factor: 2.417
Authors: David T Bundy; Mark Wronkiewicz; Mohit Sharma; Daniel W Moran; Maurizio Corbetta; Eric C Leuthardt Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2012-05-22 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Anthony Ritaccio; Michael Beauchamp; Conrado Bosman; Peter Brunner; Edward Chang; Nathan Crone; Aysegul Gunduz; Disha Gupta; Robert Knight; Eric Leuthardt; Brian Litt; Daniel Moran; Jeffrey Ojemann; Josef Parvizi; Nick Ramsey; Jochem Rieger; Jonathan Viventi; Bradley Voytek; Justin Williams; Gerwin Schalk Journal: Epilepsy Behav Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 2.937
Authors: Wei Wang; Jennifer L Collinger; Monica A Perez; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Leonardo G Cohen; Niels Birbaumer; Steven W Brose; Andrew B Schwartz; Michael L Boninger; Douglas J Weber Journal: Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 1.784
Authors: Mohit Sharma; Charles Gaona; Jarod Roland; Nick Anderson; Zachary Freudenberg; Eric C Leuthardt Journal: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2009
Authors: Nicholas R Anderson; Tim Blakely; Gerwin Schalk; Eric C Leuthardt; Daniel W Moran Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2012-09-22 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Karunesh Ganguly; Lavi Secundo; Gireeja Ranade; Amy Orsborn; Edward F Chang; Dragan F Dimitrov; Jonathan D Wallis; Nicholas M Barbaro; Robert T Knight; Jose M Carmena Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2009-10-14 Impact factor: 6.167