Literature DB >> 18927095

Ethnic differences in participation in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in the UK.

Kathryn A Robb1, Emily Power, Wendy Atkin, Jane Wardle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to examine ethnic differences in participation in colorectal cancer screening by flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS). It assessed both intentions to be screened and actual screening uptake, and considered whether demographic, health and psychosocial factors mediated the ethnic differences. The setting of this study follows a subset of participants from the UK FS Trial.
METHODS: A postal questionnaire assessed ethnicity, demographic characteristics, health, attitudes to screening and FS screening intentions. Data on screening intentions were available for 17,333 adults aged 55-64 years (Sample 1). Screening uptake was recorded in a subsample of 4303 respondents who were subsequently randomized to receive an invitation to screening (Sample 2).
RESULTS: Screening intentions in Sample 1 were equally high across all the ethnic groups (>80% [13,724/17,042] reported they were interested). In contrast, attendance (Sample 2) was considerably lower among Asians (54% [43/79]) compared with White (69% [2843/4123]) or Black (80% [33/41]) respondents. Multivariate analysis showed that potential explanatory factors, including socioeconomic deprivation, poor health and fearful and fatalistic attitudes did not account for the lower screening attendance among Asians.
CONCLUSION: Further research is required to identify explanations for the gap between intentions and behaviour in UK Asians if any future FS screening programme is to be introduced equitably.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18927095     DOI: 10.1258/jms.2008.007112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  22 in total

1.  Birthplace is not a determinant of colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Fiona Tran; Jenn Hian Koo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Beyond the black box: a systematic review of breast, prostate, colorectal, and cervical screening among native and immigrant African-descent Caribbean populations.

Authors:  Nathan S Consedine; Natalie L Tuck; Camille R Ragin; Benjamin A Spencer
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-06

3.  Exploring disparities and variability in perceptions and self-reported colorectal cancer screening among three ethnic subgroups of U. S. Blacks.

Authors:  Clement K Gwede; Claire M William; Kamilah B Thomas; Will L Tarver; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil; Jongphil Kim; Ji-Hyun Lee; Cathy D Meade
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Non-compliance with the initial screening exam visit in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Pamela M Marcus; Sheryl L Ogden; Lisa H Gren; Jeffery C Childs; Shannon M Pretzel; Lois E Lamerato; Kayo Walsh; Heather M Rozjabek; Jerome Mabie; Brett Thomas; Tom Riley
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Attitudes and beliefs of non-participants in a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nicola J Hall; Greg P Rubin; Christina Dobson; David Weller; Jane Wardle; Mary Ritchie; Colin J Rees
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Using record linkage to monitor equity and variation in screening programmes.

Authors:  Dermot O'Reilly; Heather Kinnear; Michael Rosato; Adrian Mairs; Clare Hall
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Uptake in cancer screening programmes: a priority in cancer control.

Authors:  D P Weller; C Campbell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Awareness of cancer symptoms and anticipated help seeking among ethnic minority groups in England.

Authors:  J Waller; K Robb; S Stubbings; A Ramirez; U Macleod; J Austoker; S Hiom; J Wardle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Factors affecting attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening in the primary care population.

Authors:  T Taskila; S Wilson; S Damery; A Roalfe; V Redman; T Ismail; R Hobbs
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Responses to procedural information about colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood testing: the role of consideration of future consequences.

Authors:  Christian von Wagner; Anna Good; Samuel G Smith; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.