Literature DB >> 18926995

When confidence in a choice is independent of which choice is made.

Asher Koriat1.   

Abstract

For forced-choice two-alternative general-information questions, confidence in the correctness of the answer differed reliably for different questions, regardless of which answer was chosen. Results suggested that this choice-independent confidence is mediated by the domain familiarity of the question and by its tendency to bring to mind either few or many thoughts and considerations. Ratings of the questions on familiarity and accessibility yielded strong correlations with participants' confidence in whichever of two answers they had chosen, and with estimates of the percentage of participants who were likely to have chosen either of the answers in a previous experiment. The results were interpreted in terms of confirmation bias: Because items differ in the extent to which they bring to mind few or many pertinent thoughts, selective focusing on supportive evidence should yield a positive correlation between mean confidence in one answer and mean confidence in the alternative answer, as if there is no competition between them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18926995     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  9 in total

1.  The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing.

Authors:  A Koriat; R Levy-Sadot
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Inflation of conditional predictions.

Authors:  Asher Koriat; Klaus Fiedler; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-08

3.  Processes leading to confidence and accuracy in sentence recognition: a metamemory approach.

Authors:  William F Brewer; Cristina Sampaio
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2006-07

4.  Phonetic symbolism and feeling of knowing.

Authors:  A Koriat
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-09

5.  Another look at the relationship between phonetic symbolism and the feeling of knowing.

Authors:  A Koriat
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1976-05

Review 6.  Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy.

Authors:  A Koriat; M Goldsmith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing.

Authors:  A Koriat
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition.

Authors:  J Metcalfe; B L Schwartz; S G Joaquim
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Subjective confidence in one's answers: the consensuality principle.

Authors:  Asher Koriat
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.051

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Distinguishing highly confident accurate and inaccurate memory: insights about relevant and irrelevant influences on memory confidence.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Chua; Deborah E Hannula; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2012

2.  Certainty in categorical judgment of size.

Authors:  Eric J Fimbel; René Michaud; Mathieu Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Building metamemorial knowledge over time: insights from eye tracking about the bases of feeling-of-knowing and confidence judgments.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Chua; Lisa A Solinger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-18

4.  Is there a G factor for metacognition? Correlations in retrospective metacognitive sensitivity across tasks.

Authors:  Audrey Mazancieux; Stephen M Fleming; Céline Souchay; Chris J A Moulin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2020-03-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.