Literature DB >> 18925751

Computed crystal energy landscapes for understanding and predicting organic crystal structures and polymorphism.

Sarah Sally L Price1.   

Abstract

The phenomenon of polymorphism, the ability of a molecule to adopt more than one crystal structure, is a well-established property of crystalline solids. The possible variations in physical properties between polymorphs make the reliable reproduction of a crystalline form essential for all research using organic materials, as well as quality control in manufacture. Thus, the last two decades have seen both an increase in interest in polymorphism and the availability of the computer power needed to make the computational prediction of organic crystal structures a practical possibility. In the past decade, researchers have made considerable improvements in the theoretical basis for calculating the sets of structures that are within the energy range of possible polymorphism, called crystal energy landscapes. It is common to find that a molecule has a wide variety of ways of packing with lattice energy within a few kilojoules per mole of the most stable structure. However, as we develop methods to search for and characterize "all" solid forms, it is also now usual for polymorphs and solvates to be found. Thus, the computed crystal energy landscape reflects and to an increasing extent "predicts" the emerging complexity of the solid state observed for many organic molecules. This Account will discuss the ways in which the calculation of the crystal energy landscape of a molecule can be used as a complementary technique to solid form screening for polymorphs. Current methods can predict the known crystal structure, even under "blind test" conditions, but such successes are generally restricted to those structures that are the most stable over a wide range of thermodynamic conditions. The other low-energy structures can be alternative polymorphs, which have sometimes been found in later experimental studies. Examining the computed structures reveals the various compromises between close packing, hydrogen bonding, and pi-pi stacking that can result in energetically feasible structures. Indeed, we have observed that systems with many almost equi-energetic structures that contain a common interchangeable motif correlate with a tendency to disorder and problems with control of the crystallization product. Thus, contrasting the computed crystal energy landscape with the known crystal structures of a given molecule provides a valuable complement to solid form screening, and the examination of the low-energy structures often leads to a rationalization of the forms found.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 18925751     DOI: 10.1021/ar800147t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acc Chem Res        ISSN: 0001-4842            Impact factor:   22.384


  28 in total

1.  Modular and predictable assembly of porous organic molecular crystals.

Authors:  James T A Jones; Tom Hasell; Xiaofeng Wu; John Bacsa; Kim E Jelfs; Marc Schmidtmann; Samantha Y Chong; Dave J Adams; Abbie Trewin; Florian Schiffman; Furio Cora; Ben Slater; Alexander Steiner; Graeme M Day; Andrew I Cooper
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Crystal Structure Prediction from First Principles: The Crystal Structures of Glycine.

Authors:  Albert M Lund; Gabriel I Pagola; Anita M Orendt; Marta B Ferraro; Julio C Facelli
Journal:  Chem Phys Lett       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 2.328

3.  Trapping virtual pores by crystal retro-engineering.

Authors:  Marc A Little; Michael E Briggs; James T A Jones; Marc Schmidtmann; Tom Hasell; Samantha Y Chong; Kim E Jelfs; Linjiang Chen; Andrew I Cooper
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 24.427

4.  Tunable recognition of the steroid alpha-face by adjacent pi-electron density.

Authors:  T Friscić; R W Lancaster; L Fábián; P G Karamertzanis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Hidden polymorphs drive vitrification in B2O3.

Authors:  Guillaume Ferlat; Ari Paavo Seitsonen; Michele Lazzeri; Francesco Mauri
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 43.841

6.  Which, if any, hydrates will crystallise? Predicting hydrate formation of two dihydroxybenzoic acids.

Authors:  Doris E Braun; Panagiotis G Karamertzanis; Sarah L Price
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Absorbing a Little Water: The Structural, Thermodynamic, and Kinetic Relationship between Pyrogallol and Its Tetarto-Hydrate.

Authors:  Doris E Braun; Rajni M Bhardwaj; Jean-Baptiste Arlin; Alastair J Florence; Volker Kahlenberg; Ulrich J Griesser; Derek A Tocher; Sarah L Price
Journal:  Cryst Growth Des       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.076

8.  Solid-State Forms of β-Resorcylic Acid: How Exhaustive Should a Polymorph Screen Be?

Authors:  Doris E Braun; Panagiotis G Karamertzanis; Jean-Baptiste Arlin; Alastair J Florence; Volker Kahlenberg; Derek A Tocher; Ulrich J Griesser; Sarah L Price
Journal:  Cryst Growth Des       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 4.076

9.  On/off porosity switching and post-assembly modifications of Cu4L4 metal-organic polyhedra.

Authors:  Witold M Bloch; Ravichandar Babarao; Matthew L Schneider
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  Complex Polymorphic System of Gallic Acid-Five Monohydrates, Three Anhydrates, and over 20 Solvates.

Authors:  Doris E Braun; Rajni M Bhardwaj; Alastair J Florence; Derek A Tocher; Sarah L Price
Journal:  Cryst Growth Des       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 4.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.