UNLABELLED: Carbohydrate restriction is a common weight-loss approach that modifies hepatic metabolism by increasing gluconeogenesis (GNG) and ketosis. Because little is known about the effect of carbohydrate restriction on the origin of gluconeogenic precursors (GNG from glycerol [GNG(glycerol)] and GNG from lactate/amino acids [GNG(phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP))]) or its consequence to hepatic energy homeostasis, we studied these parameters in a group of overweight/obese subjects undergoing weight-loss via dietary restriction. We used (2)H and (13)C tracers and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure the sources of hepatic glucose and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle flux in weight-stable subjects (n = 7) and subjects following carbohydrate restriction (n = 7) or calorie restriction (n = 7). The majority of hepatic glucose production in carbohydrate restricted subjects came from GNG(PEP). The contribution of glycerol to GNG was similar in all groups despite evidence of increased fat oxidation in carbohydrate restricted subjects. A strong correlation between TCA cycle flux and GNG(PEP) was found, though the reliance on TCA cycle energy production for GNG was attenuated in subjects undergoing carbohydrate restriction. Together, these data imply that the TCA cycle is the energetic patron of GNG. However, the relationship between these two pathways is modified by carbohydrate restriction, suggesting an increased reliance of the hepatocyte on energy generated outside of the TCA cycle when GNG(PEP) is maximal. CONCLUSION: Carbohydrate restriction modifies hepatic GNG by increasing reliance on substrates like lactate or amino acids but not glycerol. This modification is associated with a reorganization of hepatic energy metabolism suggestive of enhanced hepatic beta-oxidation.
UNLABELLED: Carbohydrate restriction is a common weight-loss approach that modifies hepatic metabolism by increasing gluconeogenesis (GNG) and ketosis. Because little is known about the effect of carbohydrate restriction on the origin of gluconeogenic precursors (GNG from glycerol [GNG(glycerol)] and GNG from lactate/amino acids [GNG(phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP))]) or its consequence to hepatic energy homeostasis, we studied these parameters in a group of overweight/obese subjects undergoing weight-loss via dietary restriction. We used (2)H and (13)C tracers and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure the sources of hepatic glucose and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle flux in weight-stable subjects (n = 7) and subjects following carbohydrate restriction (n = 7) or calorie restriction (n = 7). The majority of hepatic glucose production in carbohydrate restricted subjects came from GNG(PEP). The contribution of glycerol to GNG was similar in all groups despite evidence of increased fat oxidation in carbohydrate restricted subjects. A strong correlation between TCA cycle flux and GNG(PEP) was found, though the reliance on TCA cycle energy production for GNG was attenuated in subjects undergoing carbohydrate restriction. Together, these data imply that the TCA cycle is the energetic patron of GNG. However, the relationship between these two pathways is modified by carbohydrate restriction, suggesting an increased reliance of the hepatocyte on energy generated outside of the TCA cycle when GNG(PEP) is maximal. CONCLUSION:Carbohydrate restriction modifies hepatic GNG by increasing reliance on substrates like lactate or amino acids but not glycerol. This modification is associated with a reorganization of hepatic energy metabolism suggestive of enhanced hepatic beta-oxidation.
Authors: Shawn C Burgess; Merrill Nuss; Visvanathan Chandramouli; Dana S Hardin; Mark Rice; Bernard R Landau; Craig R Malloy; A Dean Sherry Journal: Anal Biochem Date: 2003-07-15 Impact factor: 3.365
Authors: Natasha Hausler; Jeffrey Browning; Matthew Merritt; Charles Storey; Angela Milde; F Mark H Jeffrey; A Dean Sherry; Craig R Malloy; Shawn C Burgess Journal: Biochem J Date: 2006-03-01 Impact factor: 3.857
Authors: Eunsook S Jin; John G Jones; Shawn C Burgess; Matthew E Merritt; A Dean Sherry; Craig R Malloy Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Hellan Kang; Joel K Greenson; Jason T Omo; Cewin Chao; Debra Peterman; Lilian Anderson; Laura Foess-Wood; Mary A Sherbondy; Hari S Conjeevaram Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Shawn C Burgess; Teresa C Leone; Adam R Wende; Michelle A Croce; Zhouji Chen; A Dean Sherry; Craig R Malloy; Brian N Finck Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2006-05-02 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Gideon Allick; Peter H Bisschop; Mariette T Ackermans; Erik Endert; Alfred J Meijer; Folkert Kuipers; Hans P Sauerwein; Johannes A Romijn Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Jeffrey D Browning; Jonathan A Baker; Thomas Rogers; Jeannie Davis; Santhosh Satapati; Shawn C Burgess Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2011-03-02 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Santhosh Satapati; Nishanth E Sunny; Blanka Kucejova; Xiaorong Fu; Tian Teng He; Andrés Méndez-Lucas; John M Shelton; Jose C Perales; Jeffrey D Browning; Shawn C Burgess Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2012-04-09 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Aadhavi Sridharan; Mariana Pehar; M Shahriar Salamat; Thomas D Pugh; Barbara B Bendlin; Auriel A Willette; Rozalyn M Anderson; Joseph W Kemnitz; Ricki J Colman; Richard H Weindruch; Luigi Puglielli; Sterling C Johnson Journal: Brain Res Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 3.252