Literature DB >> 18925572

Low birth weight of contemporary African Americans: an intergenerational effect of slavery?

Grazyna Jasienska1.   

Abstract

The average birth weight in the contemporary African-American population is about 250 g lower than the average birth weight of European Americans. Differences in genetic and socioeconomic factors present between these two groups can explain only part of birth weight variation. I propose a hypothesis that the low birth weight of contemporary African Americans not only results from the difference in present exposure to lifestyle factors known to affect fetal development but also from conditions experienced during the period of slavery. Slaves had poor nutritional status during all stages of life because of the inadequate dietary intake accompanied by high energetic costs of physical work and infectious diseases. The concept of "fetal programming" suggests that physiology and metabolism including growth and fat accumulation of the developing fetus, and, thus its birth weight, depend on intergenerational signal of environmental quality passed through generations of matrilinear ancestors. I suggest that several generations that have passed since the abolition of slavery in the United States (1865) has not been enough to obliterate the impact of slavery on the current biological and health condition of the African-American population. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18925572     DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.20824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Biol        ISSN: 1042-0533            Impact factor:   1.937


  15 in total

1.  Intergenerational transmission of the effects of acculturation on health in Hispanic Americans: a fetal programming perspective.

Authors:  Molly Fox; Sonja Entringer; Claudia Buss; Jessica DeHaene; Pathik D Wadhwa
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  How boys grow determines how long they live.

Authors:  David J P Barker; Eero Kajantie; Clive Osmond; Kent L Thornburg; Johan G Eriksson
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 1.937

3.  Perceived discrimination and risk of preterm birth among Turkish immigrant women in Germany.

Authors:  Laura Scholaske; Annette Brose; Jacob Spallek; Sonja Entringer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Indian boarding school experience, substance use, and mental health among urban two-spirit American Indian/Alaska natives.

Authors:  Teresa Evans-Campbell; Karina L Walters; Cynthia R Pearson; Christopher D Campbell
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.829

5.  Developmental Programming: Priming Disease Susceptibility for Subsequent Generations.

Authors:  L C Messer; J Boone-Heinonen; L Mponwane; L Wallack; K L Thornburg
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2015-03-01

6.  Acculturation and interleukin (IL)-6 concentrations across pregnancy among Mexican-American women.

Authors:  Laura Scholaske; Claudia Buss; Pathik D Wadhwa; Sonja Entringer
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 7.217

7.  Ethnic differences in the accumulation of fat and lean mass in late gestation.

Authors:  Michelle Lampl; Wesley Lee; Winston Koo; Edward A Frongillo; David J P Barker; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 1.937

8.  The association of remotely-sensed outdoor temperature with blood pressure levels in REGARDS: a cross-sectional study of a large, national cohort of African-American and white participants.

Authors:  Shia T Kent; George Howard; William L Crosson; Ronald J Prineas; Leslie A McClure
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  Comparison of Various Equations for Estimating GFR in Malawi: How to Determine Renal Function in Resource Limited Settings?

Authors:  Nicola Glaser; Andreas Deckert; Sam Phiri; Dietrich Rothenbacher; Florian Neuhann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Can environmental conditions experienced in early life influence future generations?

Authors:  Tim Burton; Neil B Metcalfe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.