RATIONALE: Cognitive inflexibility in schizophrenia is treatment-resistant and predictive of poor outcome. This study examined the effect of asenapine, a novel psychopharmacologic agent being developed for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, on cognitive dysfunction in the rat. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this paper was to establish whether asenapine has a beneficial effect on the performance of rats with ibotenic acid-induced lesion of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in an intradimensional/extradimensional (ID/ED) test of cognitive flexibility. METHODS: The effect of subcutaneously administered asenapine (0.75, 7.5, 75 microg/kg) on ID/ED performance of controls or mPFC-lesioned rats was examined using a within-subjects, repeated-measures design. In a second experiment, lesioned and control rats were tested with or without asenapine in a modified version of the task, with multiple set-shifts, before brains were processed for Fos-immunoreactivity in the mPFC. RESULTS: The mPFC lesion-induced deficit in the ID/ED task was stable with repeated testing over more than two months. Asenapine (75 microg/kg s.c., p < 0.05) completely restored the performance of lesioned rats. Experiment 2 replicated both lesion and asenapine effects and demonstrated that it is possible to measure set-shifting multiple times within a test session. Asenapine (75 microg/kg s.c.) was associated with differential activation of the neurons in the anterior mPFC of lesioned animals, but was without effect in controls. CONCLUSION: Asenapine can ameliorate mPFC lesion-induced impairment in attentional set-shifting, and is associated with a greater activation of the spared neurons in the anterior mPFC. These data suggest that asenapine may benefit impaired cognitive flexibility in disorders such as schizophrenia.
RATIONALE: Cognitive inflexibility in schizophrenia is treatment-resistant and predictive of poor outcome. This study examined the effect of asenapine, a novel psychopharmacologic agent being developed for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, on cognitive dysfunction in the rat. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this paper was to establish whether asenapine has a beneficial effect on the performance of rats with ibotenic acid-induced lesion of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in an intradimensional/extradimensional (ID/ED) test of cognitive flexibility. METHODS: The effect of subcutaneously administered asenapine (0.75, 7.5, 75 microg/kg) on ID/ED performance of controls or mPFC-lesioned rats was examined using a within-subjects, repeated-measures design. In a second experiment, lesioned and control rats were tested with or without asenapine in a modified version of the task, with multiple set-shifts, before brains were processed for Fos-immunoreactivity in the mPFC. RESULTS: The mPFC lesion-induced deficit in the ID/ED task was stable with repeated testing over more than two months. Asenapine (75 microg/kg s.c., p < 0.05) completely restored the performance of lesioned rats. Experiment 2 replicated both lesion and asenapine effects and demonstrated that it is possible to measure set-shifting multiple times within a test session. Asenapine (75 microg/kg s.c.) was associated with differential activation of the neurons in the anterior mPFC of lesioned animals, but was without effect in controls. CONCLUSION:Asenapine can ameliorate mPFC lesion-induced impairment in attentional set-shifting, and is associated with a greater activation of the spared neurons in the anterior mPFC. These data suggest that asenapine may benefit impaired cognitive flexibility in disorders such as schizophrenia.
Authors: Erin L Zelinski; Nancy S Hong; Amanda V Tyndall; Brett Halsall; Robert J McDonald Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Jon E Grant; Samuel R Chamberlain; Brian L Odlaug; Marc N Potenza; Suck Won Kim Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Hugh M Marston; Jared W Young; Frederic D C Martin; Kevin A Serpa; Christopher L Moore; Erik H F Wong; Lisa Gold; Leonard T Meltzer; Marc R Azar; Mark A Geyer; Mohammed Shahid Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2009-05-22 Impact factor: 4.530