Literature DB >> 18924097

The selection of appropriate bacterial strains in preclinical evaluation of infection-resistant biomaterials.

D Campoccia1, L Montanaro, T F Moriarty, R G Richards, S Ravaioli, C R Arciola.   

Abstract

Implant-related infections are broadly recognized as one of the most serious and devastating complications associated with the use of biomaterials in medical practice. The growing interest and need for the development of implant materials with reduced susceptibility to microbial colonization and biofilm formation has necessitated the development of a series of in vitro and in vivo models for evaluation and preclinical testing. Current technologies provide these investigations with an ample choice of qualitative and quantitative techniques for an accurate assessment of the bioactivity and anti-infective efficacy of any new compound or device. These tests are typically performed using a reference bacterial strain designated as the test or reference strain. Recent molecular epidemiological studies have identified the complex clonal nature of most prevalent etiological agents implicated in implant-associated infections. New information which is continually emerging on the identity and the characteristics of both sporadic and epidemic clones must be considered when selecting a reference. A new emerging requirement is that the strain should be representative of the clones causing clinically relevant infections; they should, therefore, belong to the most prevalent epidemic clones rather than to sporadic ones, which may occur in only 1 out of 200 infections or even fewer. The correct choice of reference strain for preclinical tests is of crucial importance for the clinical significance of the achieved results. In this paper we report our experience and recommendations regarding this issue.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18924097     DOI: 10.1177/039139880803100913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Artif Organs        ISSN: 0391-3988            Impact factor:   1.595


  6 in total

1.  Infection in fracture fixation: can we influence infection rates through implant design?

Authors:  T Fintan Moriarty; U Schlegel; S Perren; R Geoff Richards
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  3D-Printed Gentamicin-Releasing Poly-ε-Caprolactone Composite Prevents Fracture-Related Staphylococcus aureus Infection in Mice.

Authors:  Clara Guarch-Pérez; Bahaa Shaqour; Martijn Riool; Bart Verleije; Koen Beyers; Chris Vervaet; Paul Cos; Sebastian A J Zaat
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 6.525

3.  Cocktail of isobavachalcone and curcumin enhance eradication of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm from orthopedic implants by gentamicin and alleviate inflammatory osteolysis.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Hao Hu; Fangli Huang; Zemin Ling; Bolin Chen; Bizhi Tan; Tingxuan Wang; Xiao Liu; Chun Liu; Xuenong Zou
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Intraoperative loading of calcium phosphate-coated implants with gentamicin prevents experimental Staphylococcus aureus infection in vivo.

Authors:  Keith Thompson; Stoyan Petkov; Stephan Zeiter; Christoph M Sprecher; R Geoff Richards; T Fintan Moriarty; Henk Eijer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Dendritic Cells Internalize Staphylococcus aureus More Efficiently than Staphylococcus epidermidis, but Do Not Differ in Induction of Antigen-Specific T Cell Proliferation.

Authors:  Payal P Balraadjsing; Esther C de Jong; Willem J B van Wamel; Sebastian A J Zaat
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-12-20

Review 6.  Surface Design for Antibacterial Materials: From Fundamentals to Advanced Strategies.

Authors:  Wenlong Li; Eng San Thian; Miao Wang; Zuyong Wang; Lei Ren
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 16.806

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.