Literature DB >> 18923764

Microbiological guideline values for recreational bathing in Canada: Time for change?

Benoit Lévesque1, Denis Gauvin.   

Abstract

Recreational bathing is an activity practiced by thousands of Canadians every year. While its health benefits are numerous, bathing in polluted water can also be a source of health problems. These problems are generally nonspecific and are difficult to detect through usual health monitoring systems. Most involve ear and eye ailments, febrile respiratory illness and, particularly, gastroenteritis. In 1992, Health Canada recommended microbiological guideline values for recreational water quality. The values are based on the presence of fecal indicator bacteria, namely, enterococci for marine water, and Escherichia coli or fecal coliforms for fresh water. In marine water, the guideline value is set at 35 enterococci/100 mL, while in fresh water, the standard is 200 E coli/100 mL or 200 fecal coliforms/100 mL when experience demonstrates that over 90% of the fecal coliforms are E coli. Notwithstanding certain variances, many Canadian provinces apply these guidelines. However, in Ontario, the guideline is 100 E coli/100 mL. Over the past several years, many epidemiological studies, including randomized clinical trials, have examined the relationship between bathing in polluted water and ensuing health problems. On review of this literature, the Canadian guideline values for marine water seems appropriate, but scientific evidence argues toward lowering the Canadian guideline values for fresh water to 100 E coli/100 mL, in line with the standard currently in effect in Ontario.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bathing; Enterococci; Escherichia coli; Fecal coliforms; Guidelines; Recreational water

Year:  2007        PMID: 18923764      PMCID: PMC2533533          DOI: 10.1155/2007/180308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol        ISSN: 1712-9532            Impact factor:   2.471


  8 in total

1.  Marine waters contaminated with domestic sewage: nonenteric illnesses associated with bather exposure in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  J M Fleisher; D Kay; R L Salmon; F Jones; M D Wyer; A F Godfree
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Predicting likelihood of gastroenteritis from sea bathing: results from randomised exposure.

Authors:  D Kay; J M Fleisher; R L Salmon; F Jones; M D Wyer; A F Godfree; Z Zelenauch-Jacquotte; R Shore
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-10-01       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  A prospective study of swimming-related illness. I. Swimming-associated health risk.

Authors:  P L Seyfried; R S Tobin; N E Brown; P F Ness
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  A prospective study of swimming-related illness. II. Morbidity and the microbiological quality of water.

Authors:  P L Seyfried; R S Tobin; N E Brown; P F Ness
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Swimming-associated gastroenteritis and water quality.

Authors:  V J Cabelli; A P Dufour; L J McCabe; M A Levin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  A randomized controlled trial assessing infectious disease risks from bathing in fresh recreational waters in relation to the concentration of Escherichia coli, intestinal enterococci, Clostridium perfringens, and somatic coliphages.

Authors:  Albrecht Wiedenmann; Petra Krüger; Klaus Dietz; Juan M López-Pila; Regine Szewzyk; Konrad Botzenhart
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Rapidly measured indicators of recreational water quality are predictive of swimming-associated gastrointestinal illness.

Authors:  Timothy J Wade; Rebecca L Calderon; Elizabeth Sams; Michael Beach; Kristen P Brenner; Ann H Williams; Alfred P Dufour
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Do U.S. Environmental Protection Agency water quality guidelines for recreational waters prevent gastrointestinal illness? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Timothy J Wade; Nitika Pai; Joseph N S Eisenberg; John M Colford
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.