Literature DB >> 18923066

Older adults' attitudes toward enrollment of non-competent subjects participating in Alzheimer's research.

Jason Karlawish1, Jonathan Rubright, David Casarett, Mark Cary, Thomas Ten Have, Pamela Sankar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Research that seeks to enroll noncompetent patients with Alzheimer's disease without presenting any potential benefit to participants is the source of substantial ethical controversy. The authors used hypothetical Alzheimer's disease studies that included either a blood draw or a blood draw and lumbar puncture to explore older persons' attitudes on this question.
METHOD: Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 538 persons age 65 and older. Questions explored participants' understanding of research concepts, their views on enrolling persons with Alzheimer's disease in research, and their preferences regarding having a proxy decision maker, granting advance consent, and granting their proxy leeway to override the participant's decision. Additional questions assessed altruism, trust, value for research, and perceptions of Alzheimer's disease.
RESULTS: The majority (83%) were willing to grant advance consent to a blood draw study, and nearly half (48%) to a blood draw plus lumbar puncture study. Most (96%) were willing to identify a proxy for research decision making, and most were willing to grant their proxy leeway over their advance consent: 81% for the blood draw study and 70% for the blood draw plus lumbar puncture study. Combining the preferences for advance consent and leeway, the proportion who would permit being enrolled in the blood draw and lumbar puncture studies, respectively, were 92% and 75%. Multivariate models showed that willingness to be enrolled in research was most strongly associated with a favorable attitude toward biomedical research.
CONCLUSIONS: Older adults generally support enrolling noncompetent persons with Alzheimer's disease into research that does not present a benefit to subjects. Willingness to grant their proxy leeway over advance consent and a favorable attitude about biomedical research substantially explain this willingness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18923066      PMCID: PMC2635420          DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08050645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  20 in total

1.  Are research ethics bad for our mental health?

Authors:  R Michels
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-05-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Alzheimer's disease patients' and caregivers' capacity, competency, and reasons to enroll in an early-phase Alzheimer's disease clinical trial.

Authors:  Jason H T Karlawish; David J Casarett; Bryan D James
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Ethics and politics of research involving subjects with impaired decision-making abilities.

Authors:  Scott Y H Kim; Jason H T Karlawish
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-12-23       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Development and testing of the health care system distrust scale.

Authors:  Abigail Rose; Nikki Peters; Judy A Shea; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Regression analysis for correlated data.

Authors:  K Y Liang; S L Zeger
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 21.981

6.  Ethical aspects of dementia research: informed consent and proxy consent.

Authors:  G A Sachs; C B Stocking; R Stern; D M Cox; G Hougham; R S Sachs
Journal:  Clin Res       Date:  1994-10

7.  Informed consent by proxy. An issue in research with elderly patients.

Authors:  J W Warren; J Sobal; J H Tenney; J M Hoopes; D Damron; S Levenson; B R DeForge; H L Muncie
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-10-30       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1991-06-18

9.  Identifying ambulatory cancer patients at risk of impaired capacity to consent to research.

Authors:  David J Casarett; Jason H T Karlawish; Karen B Hirschman
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 10.  Advance end-of-life treatment planning. A research review.

Authors:  S H Miles; R Koepp; E P Weber
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-05-27
View more
  38 in total

1.  Acceptable Approaches to Enrolling Adults Who Cannot Consent in More Than Minimal Risk Research.

Authors:  Marion Danis; David Wendler; Scott Kim
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  Four sensitive screening tools to detect cognitive dysfunction in geriatric emergency department patients: brief Alzheimer's Screen, Short Blessed Test, Ottawa 3DY, and the caregiver-completed AD8.

Authors:  Christopher R Carpenter; Elizabeth R Bassett; Grant M Fischer; Jonathan Shirshekan; James E Galvin; John C Morris
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 3.  Ethical challenges and solutions regarding delirium studies in palliative care.

Authors:  Lisa Sweet; Dimitrios Adamis; David J Meagher; Daniel Davis; David C Currow; Shirley H Bush; Christopher Barnes; Michael Hartwick; Meera Agar; Jessica Simon; William Breitbart; Neil MacDonald; Peter G Lawlor
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  What we worry about when we worry about the ethics of clinical research.

Authors:  David Wendler
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2011-06

5.  Deliberative assessment of surrogate consent in dementia research.

Authors:  Scott Y H Kim; Rebecca A Uhlmann; Paul S Appelbaum; David S Knopman; H Myra Kim; Laura Damschroder; Elizabeth Beattie; Laura Struble; Raymond De Vries
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 21.566

6.  Informed consent, participation in research, and the Alzheimer's patient.

Authors:  Edmund Howe
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-05

7.  Why are spousal caregivers more prevalent than nonspousal caregivers as study partners in AD dementia clinical trials?

Authors:  Mark S Cary; Jonathan D Rubright; Joshua D Grill; Jason Karlawish
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.703

8.  Ethics in Psychiatric Research: A Review of 25 Years of NIH-funded Empirical Research Projects.

Authors:  James Dubois; Holly Bante; Whitney B Hadley
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2011-12-06

9.  Public's approach to surrogate consent for dementia research: cautious pragmatism.

Authors:  Raymond De Vries; Kerry A Ryan; Aimee Stanczyk; Paul S Appelbaum; Laura Damschroder; David S Knopman; Scott Y H Kim
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 4.105

10.  Decision making for participation in dementia research.

Authors:  Betty S Black; Malory Wechsler; Linda Fogarty
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.