Literature DB >> 18922652

There is no correlation between erectile dysfunction and dose to penile bulb and neurovascular bundles following real-time low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

Amy N Solan1, Jamie A Cesaretti, Nelson N Stone, Richard G Stock.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the relationship between the onset of erectile dysfunction and dose to the penile bulb and neurovascular bundles (NVBs) after real-time ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred forty-seven patients who underwent prostate brachytherapy met the following eligibility criteria: (1) treatment with 125I brachytherapy to a prescribed dose of 160 Gy with or without hormones without supplemental external beam radiation therapy, (2) identification as potent before the time of implantation based on a score of 2 or higher on the physician-assigned Mount Sinai Erectile Function Score and a score of 16 or higher on the abbreviated International Index of Erectile Function patient assessment, and (3) minimum follow-up of 12 months. Median follow-up was 25.7 months (range, 12-47 months).
RESULTS: The 3-year actuarial rate of impotence was 23% (34 of 147 patients). An additional 43% of potent patients (49 of 113 patients) were using a potency aid at last follow-up. The penile bulb volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose (V(100)) ranged from 0-0.05 cc (median, 0 cc), with a dose to the hottest 5% (D(5)) range of 12.5-97.9 Gy (median, 40.8 Gy). There was no correlation between penile bulb D(5) or V(100) and postimplantation impotency on actuarial analysis. For the combined right and left NVB structures, V(100) range was 0.3-5.1 cc (median, 1.8 cc), and V(150) range was 0-1.5 cc (median, 0.31 cc). There was no association between NVB V(100) or V(150) and postimplantation impotency on actuarial analysis.
CONCLUSION: Penile bulb doses are low after real-time ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy. We found no correlation between dose to either the penile bulb or NVBs and the development of postimplantation impotency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18922652     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.06.1946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  4 in total

1.  Reproducibility in contouring the neurovascular bundle for prostate cancer radiation therapy.

Authors:  Richard J Cassidy; Sherif G Nour; Tian Liu; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Sibo Tian; Matthew J Ferris; Robert H Press; Jim Zhong; Mustafa Abugideiri; Peter J Rossi; Ashesh B Jani
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-08-03

2.  Penile Rehabilitation Strategies Among Prostate Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Fouad Aoun; Alexandre Peltier; Roland van Velthoven
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2015

3.  Dosimetric feasibility of neurovascular bundle-sparing stereotactic body radiotherapy with periprostatic hydrogel spacer for localized prostate cancer to preserve erectile function.

Authors:  Mark E Hwang; Mark Mayeda; Hiram Shaish; Carl D Elliston; Catherine S Spina; Sven Wenske; Israel Deutsch
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Sexual function and male cancer.

Authors:  Luca Incrocci
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2013-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.