Literature DB >> 18922424

The effects of vasodilation on cardiac output measured by PiCCO.

Koichi Yamashita1, Tomoki Nishiyama, Takeshi Yokoyama, Hidehiro Abe, Masanobu Manabe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of vasodilation on cardiac output (CO) measured by pulse contour method using PiCCO (Pulsion Medical Systems AG, Munich, Germany) in comparison with CO by the thermodilution method.
DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTINGS: An operating room in a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty patients scheduled for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
INTERVENTIONS: After anesthesia induction with midazolam, fentanyl, and vecuronium, the PiCCO catheter and pulmonary artery catheter were inserted. Before the initiation of surgery, progressively higher infusions of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) were administered for vasodilation.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: CO was measured before PGE1 (control); at PGE1 0.01, 0.02, and 0.04 microg/kg/min; and 15 minutes after stopping PGE1 infusion. Systemic vascular resistances (SVRs) at PGE1 0.02 and 0.04 microg/kg/min were significantly lower than the control value. The correlation coefficient (R(2)) at each point, percentage error, and limits of agreement (bias +/- 2 standard deviation of bias) were 0.89, 17, -0.21 +/- 0.53 before PGE1; 0.72, 27, -0.31 +/- 0.93 at 0.01 microg/kg/min; 0.53, 40, -0.62 +/- 1.41 at 0.02 microg/kg/min; 0.57, 34, -0.61 +/- 1.26 at 0.04 microg/kg/min; and 0.97, 21, -0.14 +/- 0.69 L/min 15 minutes after the end of infusion, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: PiCCO may not be an alternative to thermodilution measurement without recalibration when SVR decreases by infusion of PGE1 > or = 0.02 microg/kg/min.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18922424     DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2008.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of cardiac output measures by transpulmonary thermodilution, pulse contour analysis, and pulmonary artery thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a subgroup analysis of the cardiovascular anaesthesia registry at a single tertiary centre.

Authors:  Youn Joung Cho; Chang-Hoon Koo; Tae Kyong Kim; Deok Man Hong; Yunseok Jeon
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Effective evaluation of arterial pulse waveform analysis by two-dimensional stroke volume variation-stroke volume index plots.

Authors:  Teiji Sawa; Mao Kinoshita; Atsushi Kainuma; Koichi Akiyama; Yoshifumi Naito; Hideya Kato; Fumimasa Amaya; Keiji Shigemi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring: a multicenter validation of the third-generation software in septic patients.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Gernot Marx; Andrew Tan; Christopher Junker; Marc Van Nuffelen; Lars Hüter; Willy Ching; Frédéric Michard; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Recent advance in patient monitoring.

Authors:  Tomoki Nishiyama
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-09-20

5.  Pulse pressure analysis: to make a long story short.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Uncalibrated pulse power analysis fails to reliably measure cardiac output in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Ole Broch; Jochen Renner; Jan Höcker; Matthias Gruenewald; Patrick Meybohm; Jan Schöttler; Markus Steinfath; Berthold Bein
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  A comparison of third-generation semi-invasive arterial waveform analysis with thermodilution in patients undergoing coronary surgery.

Authors:  Ole Broch; Jochen Renner; Matthias Gruenewald; Patrick Meybohm; Jan Schöttler; Markus Steinfath; Manu Malbrain; Berthold Bein
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-07-31

8.  Accuracy of an autocalibrated pulse contour analysis in cardiac surgery patients: a bi-center clinical trial.

Authors:  Ole Broch; Jose Carbonell; Carlos Ferrando; Malte Metzner; Arne Carstens; Martin Albrecht; Matthias Gruenewald; Jan Höcker; Marina Soro; Markus Steinfath; Jochen Renner; Berthold Bein
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Accuracy and precision of calibrated arterial pulse contour analysis in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage requiring high-dose vasopressor therapy: a prospective observational clinical trial.

Authors:  Sebastian M Metzelder; Mark Coburn; Christian Stoppe; Michael Fries; Tim-Philipp Simon; Marcus H T Reinges; Anke Höllig; Rolf Rossaint; Gernot Marx; Steffen Rex
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Impact of arterial load on the agreement between pulse pressure analysis and esophageal Doppler.

Authors:  Manuel Ignacio Monge García; Manuel Gracia Romero; Anselmo Gil Cano; Andrew Rhodes; Robert Michael Grounds; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.