Literature DB >> 18922377

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: advantages and disadvantages.

Mario J Quesada1, David R Marker, Michael A Mont.   

Abstract

Modern metal-on-metal resurfacing has recently gained popularity as an alternative to standard stemmed total hip arthroplasty. This study analyzed, from a literature review, the purported advantages and disadvantages of resurfacing with a comparison to standard hip arthroplasty. Advantages may include bone conservation on the femoral side with possible lower dislocation rates, more range-of-motion, more normal gait pattern, increased activity levels, increased ease of insertion with proximal femoral deformities or retained hardware, and straightforward revision. Possible disadvantages of resurfacing are increased difficulty to perform the procedure, increased acetabular bone stock loss, femoral neck fractures, and concerns about the effects of metal ions. Many of these issues will need further clarification by well-planned prospective studies and evaluation of longer-term outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18922377     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  13 in total

Review 1.  Surgical management of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Brandon E Earp; Andreas H Gomoll
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Surface replacement of the hip can result in decreased acetabular bone stock.

Authors:  Michael Tanzer; Dylan Tanzer; Karen Smith
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Kinematic radiography of the hip joint after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hiroki Kawashima; Yoshitomo Kajino; Tamon Kabata; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya; Shigeru Sanada; Katsuhiro Ichikawa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-05-20

4.  Recovery expectations of hip resurfacing compared to total hip arthroplasty: a matched pairs study.

Authors:  Hassan M K Ghomrawi; Mark M Dolan; John Rutledge; Michael M Alexiades
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Hip resurfacing: not your average hip replacement.

Authors:  Scott Siverling; Ioonna Felix; S Betty Chow; Elizabeth Niedbala; Edwin P Su
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-03

Review 6.  A meta-analysis assessing time for return to sport following hip resurfacing.

Authors:  A Magan; W Wignadasan; B Kayani; G Radhakrishnan; F Ronca; F S Haddad
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 2.928

Review 7.  Hip replacement in femoral head osteonecrosis: current concepts.

Authors:  Michelangelo Scaglione; Luca Fabbri; Fabio Celli; Francesco Casella; Giulio Guido
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2016-04-07

8.  High rate of infection after aseptic revision of failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Cody C Wyles; Robert E Van Demark; Rafael J Sierra; Robert T Trousdale
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Outcome of revision surgery for adverse local tissue reactions in patients with recalled total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian Klemt; Sakkadech Limmahakhun; Georges Bounajem; Christopher M Melnic; Michael J Harvey; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.928

10.  The effect of surgical approach on the histologyof the femoral head following resurfacing of the hip: Analysis of retrieval specimens.

Authors:  H W Amarasekera; P C Campbell; N Parsons; J Achten; J Masters; D R Griffin; M L Costa
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.