Literature DB >> 18922374

Analysis of published evidence on minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.

Simon J Wall1, Simon C Mears.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery has become a popular method of total hip arthroplasty. This study reviewed the literature to determine the number and quality of scientific publications analyzing different types of minimally invasive surgery approaches. The miniposterior approach has been studied the most and to our knowledge is the only approach with good quality randomized control study evidence. The overall length of follow-up and quality of reports for minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty is low.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18922374     DOI： 10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN： 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  14 in total

1.  [MRI-based measurement of muscle damage after minimally invasive hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  M Lüdemann; J Kreutner; D Haddad; W Kenn; M Rudert; U Nöth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Is limited incision better than standard total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joseph T Moskal; Susan G Capps
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Minimal incision surgery as a risk factor for early failure of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bradley P Graw; Steven T Woolson; Heather G Huddleston; Stuart B Goodman; James I Huddleston
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Minimally invasive versus classic procedures in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jon H M Goosen; Boudewijn J Kollen; René M Castelein; Bart M Kuipers; Cees C Verheyen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Dutch guideline on total hip prosthesis.

Authors:  Bart A Swierstra; Anton M J S Vervest; Geert H I M Walenkamp; B Wim Schreurs; Pieter T J Spierings; Ide C Heyligers; Job L C van Susante; Harmen B Ettema; Mariette J Jansen; Pim J Hennis; Janneke de Vries; Sabrina B Muller-Ploeger; Margreet A Pols
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Minimally invasive surgical approaches and traditional total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of radiological and complications outcomes.

Authors:  Baohui Yang; Haopeng Li; Xijing He; Guoyu Wang; Siyue Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Current Concepts of Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joong-Myung Lee
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-12-28

8.  A 10-Year Follow-Up of Two-Incision and Modified Watson-Jones Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head.

Authors:  Shih-Jie Lin; Tsan-Wen Huang; Po-Chun Lin; Feng-Chih Kuo; Kuo-Ti Peng; Kuo-Chin Huang; Mel S Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Intrapelvic dislocation of a femoral trial head during primary total hip arthroplasty requiring laparotomy for retrieval.

Authors:  Mustafa Citak; Till Orla Klatte; Akos Zahar; Kimberly Day; Daniel Kendoff; Thorsten Gehrke; Arnulf Dörner; Matthias Gebauer
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2013-05-17

Review 10.  Mini-incision versus standard incision total hip arthroplasty regarding surgical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Chang-Peng Xu; Xue Li; Jin-Qi Song; Zhuang Cui; Bin Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.