BACKGROUND: Tubulin is among the most established and clinically validated targets in oncology. The taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel, stabilize microtubules and have shown significant clinical activity, but factors such as the development of resistance can limit their clinical use. The epothilones are a novel class of natural microtubule-stabilizing products with potential activity in an expanded spectrum of tumour indications. OBJECTIVE: In an extensive lead optimization programme, we selected sagopilone from 350 compounds produced by total synthesis because of its combination of potent activity and good tolerability in tumour models. It is the first fully synthetic epothilone in clinical development. METHODS: Here we review the directed optimization of the natural product epothilone B to produce sagopilone, along with its mechanism of action, preclinical data and emerging clinical results. RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS: We show how this optimization process translated into superior preclinical activity, coupled with a favourable tolerability profile. Activity has been determined in a number of animal models, including those from tumours resistant to other systemic treatments. The approach used to develop sagopilone may become more common as structure-driven research is increasingly employed to exploit the enormous potential of natural products, in parallel with other targeted approaches, heralding a new era of anticancer therapy.
BACKGROUND: Tubulin is among the most established and clinically validated targets in oncology. The taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel, stabilize microtubules and have shown significant clinical activity, but factors such as the development of resistance can limit their clinical use. The epothilones are a novel class of natural microtubule-stabilizing products with potential activity in an expanded spectrum of tumour indications. OBJECTIVE: In an extensive lead optimization programme, we selected sagopilone from 350 compounds produced by total synthesis because of its combination of potent activity and good tolerability in tumour models. It is the first fully synthetic epothilone in clinical development. METHODS: Here we review the directed optimization of the natural product epothilone B to produce sagopilone, along with its mechanism of action, preclinical data and emerging clinical results. RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS: We show how this optimization process translated into superior preclinical activity, coupled with a favourable tolerability profile. Activity has been determined in a number of animal models, including those from tumours resistant to other systemic treatments. The approach used to develop sagopilone may become more common as structure-driven research is increasingly employed to exploit the enormous potential of natural products, in parallel with other targeted approaches, heralding a new era of anticancer therapy.
Authors: Laura L Vollmer; Maria Jiménez; Daniel P Camarco; Wei Zhu; Hikmat N Daghestani; Raghavan Balachandran; Celeste E Reese; John S Lazo; Neil A Hukriede; Dennis P Curran; Billy W Day; Andreas Vogt Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2011-04-13 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Carlo Ballatore; Kurt R Brunden; Donna M Huryn; John Q Trojanowski; Virginia M-Y Lee; Amos B Smith Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Weiqiang Zhan; Yi Jiang; Shubhada Sharma; Peggy J Brodie; Susan Bane; David G I Kingston; Dennis C Liotta; James P Snyder Journal: Chemistry Date: 2011-11-30 Impact factor: 5.236
Authors: Rachel A Freedman; Elizabeth Bullitt; Lixian Sun; Rebecca Gelman; Gordon Harris; Jennifer A Ligibel; Ian E Krop; Ann H Partridge; Emily Eisenberg; Eric P Winer; Nancy U Lin Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2011-06-22 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Kurt R Brunden; John Q Trojanowski; Amos B Smith; Virginia M-Y Lee; Carlo Ballatore Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2013-12-30 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Antonio Silvani; Paola Gaviani; Anna Fiumani; Vidmer Scaioli; Elena Lamperti; Marica Eoli; Andrea Botturi; Andrea Salmaggi Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2009-04-21 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: S McMeekin; R Patel; C Verschraegen; P Celano; J Burke; S Plaxe; P Ghatage; M Giurescu; C Stredder; Y Wang; T Schmelter Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2011-11-22 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Friedrich G Kapp; Anette Sommer; Thomas Kiefer; Gottfried Dölken; Bernard Haendler Journal: Cancer Cell Int Date: 2012-01-18 Impact factor: 5.722