Literature DB >> 1891624

More on MTMM: the role of confirmatory factor analysis.

A J Figueredo1, S L Ferketich, T R Knapp.   

Abstract

This article is the second of two on the use of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) as a method to assess construct validity. The construct validation criteria required by the conventional MTMM approach are satisfied only by certain ideal data sets, such as those in which the method variance of measures is very low. The CFA approach to multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) data is more general, in that violations of those stringent criteria can be managed. Another limitation of the conventional MTMM approach is that only a relatively small number of indicators can be examined by bivariate analysis. The economy of the CFA approach permits the analysis of a much larger number of indicators. In this article, a data set is analyzed using the CFA approach. Results are presented that illustrate the application of this statistical method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1891624     DOI: 10.1002/nur.4770140510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  3 in total

1.  Integrating validity theory with use of measurement instruments in clinical settings.

Authors:  P Adam Kelly; Kimberly J O'Malley; Michael A Kallen; Marvella E Ford
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Developing and testing a middle-range theory of the well-being supportive physical environment of home-dwelling elderly.

Authors:  Satu Elo; Maria Kääriäinen; Arja Isola; Helvi Kyngäs
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-05-13

3.  Risky business: factor analysis of survey data - assessing the probability of incorrect dimensionalisation.

Authors:  Cees van der Eijk; Jonathan Rose
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.