Literature DB >> 1890644

Tonic interocular suppression and binocular summation in human vision.

N Denny1, T E Frumkes, M C Barris, T Eysteinsson.   

Abstract

1. Spatial sensitivity of human foveal vision was examined using sinusoidally modulated gratings. Our primary concern was the influence of interocular light adaptation upon monocular visibility. 2. Interocular adapting influences depend upon spatial frequency and adapting luminance. Interocular adaptation has a negligible influence upon the sensitivity to 1 cycle/deg gratings. Any visible interocular adapting field improves the sensitivity to intermediate spatial frequencies (2-5 cycles/deg). 3. Brighter interocular backgrounds (greater than 0.1 cd/m2) improve sensitivity to higher spatial frequencies (10-20 cycles/deg). 4. The interocular adapting influences summarized in (2) and (3) above cannot be duplicated by monocular or binocular adaptation. Similarly, monocular or binocular adaptation have negligible influences upon binocular visibility. 5. The interocular adapting effect summarized in (3) above can be duplicated by pressure blinding the contralateral eye. We conclude that monocular spatial sensitivity is subject to a tonic interocular suppression (TIS) from the dark-adapted eye. 6. The spatial sensitivity resulting from binocular viewing is nearly identical to that observed by combining monocular viewing with interocular light adaptation. We suggest that the improvement in sensitivity resulting from two-eyed viewing may be attributable to the removal of TIS instead of to binocular physiological summation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1890644      PMCID: PMC1180057          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  21 in total

1.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  D H HUBEL; T N WIESEL
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The cellular basis for suppressive rod-cone interaction.

Authors:  T E Frumkes; T Eysteinsson
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Interocular sensitization to a rod-detected test.

Authors:  A Reeves; N S Peachey; E Auerbach
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Push-pull effect of surround illumination on excitatory and inhibitory inputs to mudpuppy retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  J H Belgum; D R Dvorak; J S McReynolds; E Miyachi
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Background light and the contrast gain of primate P and M retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  K Purpura; E Kaplan; R M Shapley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Interocular transfer and dark adaptation to long-wave test lights.

Authors:  E Auerbach; N S Peachey
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Interocular luminance differences and the binocular pattern-reversal visual-evoked response.

Authors:  G L Trick; W W Dawson; J R Compton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Dichoptic interaction of harmonically related spatial and temporal frequencies.

Authors:  E T Schmeisser; W W Dawson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-05-14       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Further developments in binocular summation.

Authors:  R Blake; M Sloane; R Fox
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-09

10.  Monocular versus binocular visual acuity.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1965-10-09       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  6 in total

1.  Mechanism of binocular interaction in refraction errors: study using pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  A di Summa; S Fusina; L Bertolasi; S Vicentini; S Perlini; L G Bongiovanni; A Polo
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Cortical brightness adaptation when darkness and brightness produce different dynamical states in the visual cortex.

Authors:  Dajun Xing; Chun-I Yeh; James Gordon; Robert M Shapley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Retinal cross talk in the mammalian visual system.

Authors:  Xiaolan Tang; Radouil Tzekov; Christopher L Passaglia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Efferent influences on the bioelectrical activity of the retina in primates.

Authors:  Gonzalo Ortiz; J Vernon Odom; Christopher L Passaglia; Radouil T Tzekov
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 5.  Bilateral symmetry in vision and influence of ocular surgical procedures on binocular vision: A topical review.

Authors:  Samuel Arba Mosquera; Shwetabh Verma
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016-03-16

6.  Binocular summation revisited: Beyond √2.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Freya A Lygo; Tim S Meese; Mark A Georgeson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 17.737

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.