Literature DB >> 188952

Clinical and serologic study of four smallpox vaccines comparing variations of dose and route of administration. Standard percutaneous revaccination of children who receive primary percutaneous vaccination.

K McIntosh, J D Cherry, A S Benenson, J D Connor, D W Alling, U T Rolfe, W A Todd, J E Schanberger, M J Mattheis.   

Abstract

A standard challenge with percutaneous smallpox vaccine was administered to 629 children six to 12 months after percutaneous primary inoculation with one of four vaccines (New York City Board of Health strains grown in calf lymph or chorioallantoic membranes, the Lister vaccine, or the CV-1 strain). Of those who had had major reactions on primary vaccination, 8%-21% responded to revasccination with a typical primary-type skin response. In contrast, such a primary-type response occurred in 50% of those who on primary vaccination had developed serum antibody in the absence of major reactions and in 83% of those who had had no serologic or clinical evidence of primary "take." Skin lesions on revaccination tended to be largest in thosewhose primary vaccination was with CV-1, although fever and minor complications were not more frequent. Moreover, even in children who had received CV-1 vaccine, skin responses to challenge vaccine were clearly attenuated when compared with responses of children who had not had takes on primary vaccination. Sizes of lesions and acceleration of skin erytherma after challenge were related in most children to titers of both hemagglutination-inhibiting and neutralizing antibody at the time of revaccination. One month after revaccination, neutralizing antibody was present in 93%-96% of those with takes onprimary vaccination with New York City or Lister vaccines, but only 75% of CV-1 vaccines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 188952     DOI: 10.1093/infdis/135.1.155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


  5 in total

1.  Clinical and immunological study of percutaneous revaccination in children who originally received smallpox vaccine subcutaneously.

Authors:  J D Cherry; U T Rolfe; J P Dudley; A J Garakian; M Murphy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Immunogenicity and safety of defective vaccinia virus lister: comparison with modified vaccinia virus Ankara.

Authors:  B T Ober; P Brühl; M Schmidt; V Wieser; W Gritschenberger; S Coulibaly; H Savidis-Dacho; M Gerencer; F G Falkner
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Clinical and immunologic responses to multiple doses of IMVAMUNE (Modified Vaccinia Ankara) followed by Dryvax challenge.

Authors:  Sharon E Frey; Frances K Newman; Jeffrey S Kennedy; Vera Sobek; Francis A Ennis; Heather Hill; Lihan K Yan; Paul Chaplin; Jens Vollmar; Bernard R Chaitman; Robert B Belshe
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Outbreak of human monkeypox, Democratic Republic of Congo, 1996 to 1997.

Authors:  Y J Hutin; R J Williams; P Malfait; R Pebody; V N Loparev; S L Ropp; M Rodriguez; J C Knight; F K Tshioko; A S Khan; M V Szczeniowski; J J Esposito
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 5.  LC16m8: an attenuated smallpox vaccine.

Authors:  Julie Kenner; Fiona Cameron; Cyril Empig; David V Jobes; Marc Gurwith
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 3.641

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.