Literature DB >> 1889187

Antimicrobial activity of cefpirome. An update compared to five third-generation cephalosporins against nearly 6000 recent clinical isolates from five medical centers.

R N Jones1, M A Pfaller, S D Allen, E H Gerlach, P C Fuchs, K E Aldridge.   

Abstract

Cefpirome, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefoperazone, ceftizoxime, and ceftriaxone were tested against approximately 6000 fresh clinical isolates from five medical centers. For 3031 strains of Enterobacteriaceae tested, cefpirome consistently had the lowest MIC50s and lowest percentage of resistant strains. Cefpirome was also the most active agent against the 2138 Gram-positive cocci tested; Staphylococcus haemolyticus was uniformly resistant to all agents tested. Against 791 nonenteric Gram-negative bacilli, the activity of cefpirome was most comparable to that of cefoperazone and slightly less active than ceftazidime. Among the current third-generation cephalosporins, cefotaxime and cefoperazone emerged as having better overall balanced activity. Ceftazidime displayed poorest coverage against Enterobacteriaceae and Gram-positive organisms. Ceftizoxime also provided compromised coverage of staphylococci and nonenteric Gram-negative bacilli. Cefpirome remains as active as originally described in 1984 and possesses a slightly wider spectrum of activity against contemporary aerobic pathogens compared to currently marketed third-generation cephalosporins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1889187     DOI: 10.1016/0732-8893(91)90029-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  14 in total

1.  Determination of activities of levofloxacin, alone and combined with gentamicin, ceftazidime, cefpirome, and meropenem, against 124 strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by checkerboard and time-kill methodology.

Authors:  M A Visalli; M R Jacobs; P C Appelbaum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Cefpirome. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy in the treatment of severe nosocomial infections and febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  L R Wiseman; H M Lamb
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Multicentre comparative study on the antibacterial activity of FK-037, a new parenteral cephalosporin.

Authors:  J Martínez-Beltrán; R Cantón; J Liñares; J García de Lomas; C Gimeno; F Tubau; F Baquero
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  The antimicrobial activity of cefotaxime: comparative multinational hospital isolate surveys covering 15 years.

Authors:  R N Jones
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.553

5.  Comparison of strategies using cefpirome and ceftazidime for empiric treatment of pneumonia in intensive care patients. The Cefpirome Pneumonia Study Group.

Authors:  M Wolff
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Susceptibilities of Chryseobacterium indologenes and Chryseobacterium meningosepticum to cefepime and cefpirome.

Authors:  P R Hsueh; L J Teng; P C Yang; S W Ho; K T Luh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of FK037, a novel parenteral broad-spectrum cephalosporin.

Authors:  K P Fu; B D Foleno; S C Lafredo; J M LoCoco; D M Isaacson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  In vitro antimicrobial activity of cefpirome against ceftazidime-resistant isolates from two multicenter studies.

Authors:  H S Sader; R N Jones
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 9.  Cefpirome clinical pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  L C Strenkoski; D E Nix
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Update on clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  W E Kloos; T L Bannerman
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 26.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.