Literature DB >> 1888328

Inhibition of cytosolic epoxide hydrolase by trans-3-phenylglycidols.

E C Dietze1, E Kuwano, J Casas, B D Hammock.   

Abstract

The inhibition of murine cytosolic epoxide hydrolase has been studied with both racemic and enantiomerically pure trans-3-phenylglycidols. These compounds are the first enantioselective, slow binding inhibitors of cytosolic epoxide hydrolase. The (2S,3S)-3-phenylglycidol enantiomer was always a better inhibitor than the (2R,3R)-enantiomer. When the I50 values of (2S,3S)- and (2R,3R)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)glycidol were compared, the (2S,3S)-enantiomer was at least a 750-fold better inhibitor (I50 = 1.6 microM) than the (2R,3R)-enantiomer (I50 = 1200 microM), and it was the most potent inhibitor tested in the 3-phenylglycidol series. If the hydroxyl group of the glycidol was masked or converted to another functionality, the potency of the inhibitor decreased and the (2S,3S)-enantiomer was not necessarily the better inhibitor. In addition, trans-3-phenylglycidols demonstrated slow binding inhibition of cytosolic epoxide hydrolase. Inhibitors without a hydroxyl group, or with a blocked hydroxyl group, were not slow binding inhibitors. These results suggested that the hydroxyl group was important in both enantioselectivity and time dependence of inhibition of cytosolic epoxide hydrolase by trans-3-phenylglycidols. The hydration pattern of (2S,3S)- and (2R,3R)-2,3-epoxy-3-(4- nitrophenyl)glycidol by cytosolic epoxide hydrolase also differed. When incorporation of [18O] from water catalyzed by cytosolic epoxide hydrolase was measured, the (2S,3S)-enantiomer gave 12% incorporation into the benzylic carbon and the (2R,3R)-enantiometer gave 40% incorporation into the benzylic carbon. Finally, trans-3-phenylglycidols were found to be poor inhibitors of microsomal epoxide hydrolase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1888328     DOI: 10.1016/0006-2952(91)90250-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol        ISSN: 0006-2952            Impact factor:   5.858


  6 in total

1.  Detoxification of environmental mutagens and carcinogens: structure, mechanism, and evolution of liver epoxide hydrolase.

Authors:  M A Argiriadi; C Morisseau; B D Hammock; D W Christianson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Investigation of the binding mode of 1, 3, 4-oxadiazole derivatives as amide-based inhibitors for soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) by molecular docking and MM-GBSA.

Authors:  Leila Karami; Ali Akbar Saboury; Elham Rezaee; Sayyed Abbas Tabatabai
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 1.733

3.  Potent urea and carbamate inhibitors of soluble epoxide hydrolases.

Authors:  C Morisseau; M H Goodrow; D Dowdy; J Zheng; J F Greene; J R Sanborn; B D Hammock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Identification of 13-hydroxy-14,15-epoxyeicosatrienoic acid as an acid-stable endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor in rabbit arteries.

Authors:  Yuttana Chawengsub; Kathryn M Gauthier; Kasem Nithipatikom; Bruce D Hammock; John R Falck; Dubasi Narsimhaswamy; William B Campbell
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Epoxy-Oxylipins and Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase Metabolic Pathway as Targets for NSAID-Induced Gastroenteropathy and Inflammation-Associated Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Ryan D Jones; Jie Liao; Xin Tong; Dandan Xu; Leyu Sun; Haonan Li; Guang-Yu Yang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 6.  Small Molecule Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase Inhibitors in Multitarget and Combination Therapies for Inflammation and Cancer.

Authors:  Amarjyoti Das Mahapatra; Rinku Choubey; Bhaskar Datta
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.