Literature DB >> 1888186

[Notification of cancer in breast cancer patients].

K Shimozuma1, T Tominaga, K Hayashi, J Kondo, G Kosaki.   

Abstract

The notification of the name of disease is a premise for making the system of informed consent more complete in case of cancer treatment. In Japan, however, the notification of cancer can hardly be said to have an attained social consensus. Considering that the notification can ultimately improve patients quality of life (QOL), the breast cancer group of our department informs all breast cancer patients of their diseases in principle. This paper reports and discusses the results of a survey by questionnaire on the notification of cancer in 100 patients with breast cancer. The notification of cancer was received favorably in 83% of the patients. For those who answered, the explanation on the notification was convincing and it accounted for 81%. An examination of background factors of patients who had not been convinced revealed that many of them were suffered from advanced cancer. After the notification, a human relationship with the family and friends aggravated few of them and improved in 30% (family) and 18% (friends), respectively. The notification of cancer was thus suggested to contribute to the improvement of QOL. Although 83% well received the notification of their own diseases, only 21% were affirmative for the notification of cancer in case of a member of the family. We medical professionals should make a further effort not to make the notification of cancer the pronouncement death but to make it an aid for patients to live better.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1888186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gan To Kagaku Ryoho        ISSN: 0385-0684


  6 in total

1.  The Impacts of Breast Conserving Treatment and Mastectomy on the Quality of Life in Early-stage Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1995-04-30       Impact factor: 4.239

2.  Analysis of Factors Associated with Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients after Surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1994-12-30       Impact factor: 4.239

3.  Should physicians tell patients the truth?

Authors:  A Asai
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1995-07

4.  The prognostic value of quality-of-life scores: preliminary results of an analysis of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  K Shimozuma; H Sonoo; K Ichihara; K Tanaka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Causal attributions to epidemiological risk factors and their associations to later psychological adjustment among Japanese breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Shino Oba; Naoyoshi Takatsuka; Chisato Nagata; Yasuko Nagao; Satoru Yamamoto; Chiken Shibuya; Yoshitomo Kashiki; Hiroyuki Shimizu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Analysis of the factors influencing the quality of life of patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer.

Authors:  K Shimozuma; H Sonoo; K Ichihara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.