Literature DB >> 1886986

Oxygen enhancement ratio as a function of dose and cell cycle phase for radiation-resistant and sensitive CHO cells.

J P Freyer1, K Jarrett, S Carpenter, M R Raju.   

Abstract

There is still controversy over whether the oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) varies as a function of dose and cell cycle phase. In the present study, the OER has been measured as a function of survival level and cell cycle phase using volume flow cell sorting. This method allows both the separation of cells in different stages of the cycle from an asynchronously growing population, and the precise plating of cells for accurate measurements at high survival levels. We have developed a cell suspension gassing and sampling system which maintained an oxygen tension less than 20 ppm throughout a series of sequential radiation doses. For both radiation-resistant cells (CHO-K1) and a radiation-sensitive clone (CHO-xrs6), we could separate relatively pure populations of G1-phase, G1/S-boundary, S-, and G2-phase cells. Each cell line showed a typical age response, with cells at the G1/S-phase boundary being 4 (CHO-K1) to 12 (CHO-xrs6) times more sensitive than cells in the late S phase. For both cell lines, G1-phase cells had an OER of 2.3-2.4, compared to an OER of 2.8-2.9 for S-phase and 2.6-2.7 for G2-phase cells. None of these age fractions showed a dependence of OER on survival level. Asynchronously growing cells or cells at the G1/S-phase boundary had an OER similar to that of G1-phase cells at high survival levels, but the OER increased with decreasing survival level to a value near that of S-phase cells. These results suggest that the decrease in OER at high survival levels for asynchronous cells may be due to differences in the OERs of the inherent cell age subpopulations. For cells in one cell cycle stage, oxygen appears to have a purely dose-modifying effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1886986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  14 in total

1.  Modeling Cellular Response in Large-Scale Radiogenomic Databases to Advance Precision Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Venkata Sk Manem; Meghan Lambie; Ian Smith; Petr Smirnov; Victor Kofia; Mark Freeman; Marianne Koritzinsky; Mohamed E Abazeed; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Scott V Bratman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Modeling the Cellular Response of Lung Cancer to Radiation Therapy for a Broad Range of Fractionation Schedules.

Authors:  Jeho Jeong; Jung Hun Oh; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Jose Belderbos; Jeffrey D Bradley; Andrew N Fontanella; Shyam S Rao; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Oxygen distributions partly explain the radiation response of human squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  P Okunieff; J de Bie; E P Dunphy; D J Terris; M Höckel
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1996-07

Review 4.  Antioxidants reduce consequences of radiation exposure.

Authors:  Paul Okunieff; Steven Swarts; Peter Keng; Weimin Sun; Wei Wang; Jung Kim; Shanmin Yang; Hengshan Zhang; Chaomei Liu; Jacqueline P Williams; Amy K Huser; Lurong Zhang
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Papaverine and its derivatives radiosensitize solid tumors by inhibiting mitochondrial metabolism.

Authors:  Martin Benej; Xiangqian Hong; Sandip Vibhute; Sabina Scott; Jinghai Wu; Edward Graves; Quynh-Thu Le; Albert C Koong; Amato J Giaccia; Bing Yu; Ching-Shih Chen; Ioanna Papandreou; Nicholas C Denko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Theoretical analysis of the dose dependence of the oxygen enhancement ratio and its relevance for clinical applications.

Authors:  Tatiana Wenzl; Jan J Wilkens
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Modeling the spatial distribution of chronic tumor hypoxia: implications for experimental and clinical studies.

Authors:  Gibin Powathil; Mohammad Kohandel; Michael Milosevic; Siv Sivaloganathan
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  Influence of acute hypoxia and radiation quality on cell survival.

Authors:  Walter Tinganelli; Ning-Yi Ma; Cläre Von Neubeck; Andreas Maier; Corinna Schicker; Wilma Kraft-Weyrather; Marco Durante
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Optimization of treatment planning for hypoxic tumours and re-modulation of radiation intensity in heavy-ion radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ladan Rezaee
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-12-17

10.  A Mechanistic DNA Repair and Survival Model (Medras): Applications to Intrinsic Radiosensitivity, Relative Biological Effectiveness and Dose-Rate.

Authors:  Stephen Joseph McMahon; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.