Literature DB >> 1886067

The influence of short-term adaptation of human rods and cones on cone-mediated grating visibility.

F Naarendorp1, T Frumkes.   

Abstract

1. The influences of short-term visual adaptation of either rods or cones upon cone-mediated grating visibility were compared with their influences upon detection threshold in both the fovea and parafoveal retina. Short-term visual adaptation was induced by 20 deg diameter adapting fields (AFs) generally of 500 ms duration. The AF was either -0.5 log td in illuminance and too dim to influence cones, or 2.5 log td and bright enough to stimulate cones as well as rods. 2. In control experiments, we replicated previous results of Crawford (1947), Baker (1963), and other investigators and determined the influence of these AFs upon the detection threshold of a homogeneous test flash (TF) of 54 min of arc diameter and 10 ms duration. If the AF was 2.5 log td in illuminance and stimuli were presented foveally, TF threshold began to rise several hundred milliseconds before AF onset, was maximal when AF and TF were simultaneous in onset but was less elevated during the remaining presentation of the AF. TF threshold decreased to control value within several seconds after AF offset. These data represent a cone adaptation function since action spectra for both the test and adapting flashes adhere to the spectral sensitivity of the CIE standard luminous efficiency function V lambda. 3. If the AF was -0.5 log td in illuminance and if stimuli were presented parafoveally, the time course of TF detection threshold changes were similar to those described in paragraph 2 above. But these data represent a rod adaptation function since action spectra for both the test and adapting flashes adhered to the spectral sensitivity of the CIE standard luminous efficiency function V' lambda. In the fovea, the -0.5 log td AF had no influence upon the detection threshold of the TF suggesting complete rod-cone independence. 4. The influence of short-term adaptation upon spatial visibility was studied using a vertically oriented, 18 cycle/deg grating which was also 54 min of arc in diameter and 10 ms in duration. We determined the illuminance just necessary to see the bars of the grating (i.e. threshold grating illuminance or TGI) at various time intervals in respect to the onset of an AF. 5. Rod-stimulating (-0.5 log td) AFs, whether 0.5 or 2 s in duration, only influenced TGI after AF onset. TGI gradually decreased (i.e. an increase in sensitivity) during the first 250 ms of AF presentation and then remained stable until AF offset.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1886067      PMCID: PMC1181339          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  37 in total

1.  Intracellular recording from identified photoreceptors and horizontal cells of the Xenopus retina.

Authors:  G Hassin; P Witkovsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Rod-cone interaction in flicker detection.

Authors:  N J Coletta; A J Adams
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The time-course of rod-cone interaction.

Authors:  S L Buck; D L Stefurak; C Moss; D Regal
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Inhibitory influence of unstimulated rods in the human retina: evidence provided by examining cone flicker.

Authors:  S H Goldberg; T E Frumkes; R W Nygaard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-07-08       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  LEDs: convenient, inexpensive sources for visual experimentation.

Authors:  R W Nygaard; T E Frumkes
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Characteristics of the blue sensitive cone mechanism in primate retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  E Zrenner; P Gouras
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Saturation and adaptation in the rod system.

Authors:  E H Adelson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Physiological and pharmacological analysis of suppressive rod-cone interaction in Necturus retina [corrected].

Authors:  T Eysteinsson; T E Frumkes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The photocurrent, noise and spectral sensitivity of rods of the monkey Macaca fascicularis.

Authors:  D A Baylor; B J Nunn; J L Schnapf
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Rod-cone interaction in flicker perimetry: evidence for a distal retinal locus.

Authors:  K R Alexander; G A Fishman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-08-15       Impact factor: 2.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  Rod-cone interactions and the temporal impulse response of the cone pathway.

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Dingcai Cao; Joel Pokorny
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Violet and blue light blocking intraocular lenses: photoprotection versus photoreception.

Authors:  M A Mainster
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  The retina of the lab rat: focus on retinal ganglion cells and photoreceptors.

Authors:  Caridad Galindo-Romero; María Norte-Muñoz; Alejandro Gallego-Ortega; Kristy T Rodríguez-Ramírez; Fernando Lucas-Ruiz; María Josefa González-Riquelme; Manuel Vidal-Sanz; Marta Agudo-Barriuso
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 3.543

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.