Literature DB >> 1886021

Recovery of mandibular mobility following orthognathic surgery.

S B Boyd1, N D Karas, D P Sinn.   

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to define the patterns of recovery of mandibular mobility following three commonly performed orthognathic surgical procedures. Twenty-two consecutive patients undergoing either isolated Le Fort I osteotomy (LE FORT; n = 7), sagittal split ramus osteotomies (SSRO; n = 7), or intraoral vertical ramus osteotomies (IVRO; n = 9) were studied. LE FORT and SSRO patients had no mandibular immobilization, whereas IVRO patients were immobilized by dental fixation for 3 weeks. Mandibular mobility was assessed by measurement of maximal mandibular opening (MMO) and lateral and protrusive excursions. No significant difference in MMO was observed between groups prior to surgery (LE FORT, 47.0 mm; SSRO, 50.7 mm; IVRO, 54.5 mm). A significant reduction in MMO occurred immediately after surgery in the LE FORT and SSRO groups and at release of fixation in the IVRO group. Each group returned to presurgical levels of mandibular mobility at a different rate following surgery. LE FORT patients recovered quickly, regaining 83% (mean, 38.7 mm) of MMO by 1 month and exceeded preoperative levels (mean, 49.6 mm) by 6 months. SSRO patients showed hypomobility (mean, 23.5 mm) after 1 month, with significant improvement in MMO (mean, 38.0 mm) at 2 months, and nearly complete recovery (96.2%; mean, 48.8 mm) at 6 months. IVRO patients recovered rapidly after release of dental fixation, achieving 78% (mean, 39.8 mm) of preoperative MMO at 2 months. This study shows that significant differences in recovery patterns of mandibular mobility exist between surgical procedures. The clinician should be aware of these differences in recovery patterns in defining goals for individual patient rehabilitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1886021     DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(91)90054-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  5 in total

1.  [Temporomandibular function after malocclusion operations compared with a representative population group study].

Authors:  P Maurer; J J Bock; C Otto; A W Eckert; J Schubert
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2003-11-04

Review 2.  Orthognathic surgery and temporomandibular joint symptoms.

Authors:  Hwi-Dong Jung; Sang Yoon Kim; Hyung-Sik Park; Young-Soo Jung
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-05-28

3.  Establishment of a new rehabilitation program using masticatory training food for jaw deformity patients.

Authors:  Masahiko Watanabe; Nobuhiko Kawai; Manami Shibata; Emiko Nakaue; Shinya Horiuchi; Eiji Tanaka
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.719

4.  Intraoperative Hemorrhage and Postoperative Sequelae after Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy to Treat Mandibular Prognathism.

Authors:  Chun-Ming Chen; Steven Lai; Ker-Kong Chen; Huey-Er Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Effects of Chewing Exerciser on the Recovery of Masticatory Function Recovery after Orthognathic Surgery: A Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial, a Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Hoon Joo Yang; Ik Jae Kwon; Akram Abdo Almansoori; Yoojung Son; Bongju Kim; Soung-Min Kim; Jong-Ho Lee
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.