Literature DB >> 18855257

Comparison of the effect of lipophilic and hydrophilic statins on serum adiponectin levels in patients with mild hypertension and dyslipidemia: Kinki Adiponectin Interventional (KAI) Study.

Tatsuya Kai1, Shuji Arima, Yoshihiro Taniyama, Mari Nakabou, Ken Kanamasa.   

Abstract

The plasma level of adiponectin, which is known as an anti-atherogenic adipocytokine, correlates inversely with the progression of atherosclerosis. An increase in the serum adiponectin level has been reported after the administration of hydrophilic pravastatin, but not after the administration of lipophilic statins thus far. We investigated whether hydrophilic pravastatin acts distinctly from simvastatin, which has the highest lipophilicity, on the favorable effect on adiponectin in dyslipidemic patients. A total of 27 dyslipidemic patients with mild hypertension were enrolled in this study. The patients were initially treated with simvastatin 10 mg/day for six months or more (mean 7.1 months), and then were switched to pravastatin 20 mg/day. The serum adiponectin, cholesterol fractionated components, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were evaluated after six-month intervals. Switching from simvastatin to pravastatin caused little change in the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (103 mg/dl to 104 mg/dl, p = 0.782) and blood pressure (133/70 mmHg to 132/69 mmHg), while the serum adiponectin level significantly increased (11.9 mug/ml to 13.1 mug/ml, p = 0.009, respectively), and the serum CRP significantly decreased (0.078 mg/dl to 0.062 mg/dl, p = 0.040, respectively). Hydrophilic pravastatin increased the serum adiponectin level and decreased the CRP after switching from lipophilic simvastatin in the absence of any difference in the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level and blood pressure. It remains possible, however, that this difference was due not only to pharmacologic lipophilicity, but also to some other specific characteristics such as the formula of statins, the subject characteristics, race, body size, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, etc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18855257     DOI: 10.1080/10641960802251925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens        ISSN: 1064-1963            Impact factor:   1.749


  9 in total

1.  Effects of randomized rosuvastatin compared with placebo on bone and body composition among HIV-infected adults.

Authors:  Kristine M Erlandson; Ying Jiang; Sara M Debanne; Grace A McComsey
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 2.  Differential metabolic actions of specific statins: clinical and therapeutic considerations.

Authors:  Soo Lim; Ichiro Sakuma; Michael J Quon; Kwang Kon Koh
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 8.401

3.  Impact of simvastatin on adipose tissue: pleiotropic effects in vivo.

Authors:  Tayeba Khan; Mark P Hamilton; Dorothy I Mundy; Streamson C Chua; Philipp E Scherer
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 4.736

4.  Renal hemodynamic effects of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Authors:  Ladan Zand; Vicente E Torres; Timothy S Larson; Bernard F King; Sanjeev Sethi; Eric J Bergstralh; Andrea Angioi; Fernando C Fervenza
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 5.992

5.  Comparison of clinical outcomes of hydrophilic and lipophilic statins in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Min Chul Kim; Youngkeun Ahn; Su Young Jang; Kyung Hoon Cho; Seung Hwan Hwang; Min Goo Lee; Jum Suk Ko; Keun Ho Park; Doo Sun Sim; Nam Sik Yoon; Hyun Ju Yoon; Kye Hun Kim; Young Joon Hong; Hyung Wook Park; Ju Han Kim; Myung Ho Jeong; Jeong Gwan Cho; Jong Chun Park; Jung Chaee Kang
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.884

6.  Effects of simvastatin treatment on serum adiponectin concentrations in patients with dislipidemia.

Authors:  Atefeh Moezzi; Seyyed Mohammad Reza Parizadeh; Shima Tavallaie; Mohsen Mazidi; Fariba Afzali; Afrouz Adab; Gordon Ferns; Majid Ghayour Mobarhan
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 0.611

7.  The Different Cardiovascular Outcomes Between Long-Term Efficacy of Hydrophilic and Lipophilic Statin Therapy in Both Asian Diabetic Sexes.

Authors:  Shang-Yi Li; Hsin-Hung Chen; Cheng-Li Lin; Su-Yin Yeh; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Association between statin medication and hearing impairment in a national health screening cohort.

Authors:  So Young Kim; Chang Ho Lee; Chanyang Min; Dae Myoung Yoo; Hyo Geun Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Hydrophilic or Lipophilic Statins?

Authors:  Elisenda Climent; David Benaiges; Juan Pedro-Botet
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-05-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.