BACKGROUND: Existing medical therapeutic strategies to achieve and maintain clinically significant weight loss in morbid obesity remain limited and the biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) is still the most effective among the bariatric surgical procedures. Our objective was to evaluate the weight and food intake after this procedure in a rat model. METHODS: Rats randomly underwent one of the following protocols (1) BPD (n = 12) versus sham (n = 12) with a follow-up period of 30 days and (2) BPD (n = 4) versus pair-fed (PF; n = 4) with a follow-up period of 50 days. Under intraperitoneal anesthesia with ketamine-xilacine, a subcardinal corpo-antral gastrectomy was made, preserving the gastric fundus that was anastomosed to a jejunal limb after dissecting the proximal jejunum 5 cm below the ligament of Treitz to form the alimentary limb. The biliopancreatic limb was terminolaterally anastomosed to the distal ileum 5 cm above the ileocecal valve to form the common limb. Sham animals underwent only abdominal incision. Weight and food intake were measured every day. RESULTS: In protocol 1, after postoperative day 30, BPD rats exhibited a mean weight reduction of 17.9% while shams increased 12.4%. There was no difference in food intake adjusted per 100 g of body weight. In protocol 2, after postoperative day 50, BPD rats had a mean weight reduction of 22.6% and, despite increasing their caloric intake from a mean of 42.6 after 6 days to 65.8 kcal/day after 50 days, they kept a similar mean weight of 344.0 and 340.2 g, respectively; on the contrary, PF rats exhibited a 30.8% body weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: After the BPD, body weight is maintained independently of changes in food and energy intake.
BACKGROUND: Existing medical therapeutic strategies to achieve and maintain clinically significant weight loss in morbid obesity remain limited and the biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) is still the most effective among the bariatric surgical procedures. Our objective was to evaluate the weight and food intake after this procedure in a rat model. METHODS:Rats randomly underwent one of the following protocols (1) BPD (n = 12) versus sham (n = 12) with a follow-up period of 30 days and (2) BPD (n = 4) versus pair-fed (PF; n = 4) with a follow-up period of 50 days. Under intraperitoneal anesthesia with ketamine-xilacine, a subcardinal corpo-antral gastrectomy was made, preserving the gastric fundus that was anastomosed to a jejunal limb after dissecting the proximal jejunum 5 cm below the ligament of Treitz to form the alimentary limb. The biliopancreatic limb was terminolaterally anastomosed to the distal ileum 5 cm above the ileocecal valve to form the common limb. Sham animals underwent only abdominal incision. Weight and food intake were measured every day. RESULTS: In protocol 1, after postoperative day 30, BPD rats exhibited a mean weight reduction of 17.9% while shams increased 12.4%. There was no difference in food intake adjusted per 100 g of body weight. In protocol 2, after postoperative day 50, BPD rats had a mean weight reduction of 22.6% and, despite increasing their caloric intake from a mean of 42.6 after 6 days to 65.8 kcal/day after 50 days, they kept a similar mean weight of 344.0 and 340.2 g, respectively; on the contrary, PF rats exhibited a 30.8% body weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: After the BPD, body weight is maintained independently of changes in food and energy intake.
Authors: Lars Sjöström; Anna-Karin Lindroos; Markku Peltonen; Jarl Torgerson; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Sven Dahlgren; Bo Larsson; Kristina Narbro; Carl David Sjöström; Marianne Sullivan; Hans Wedel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-12-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Francesco Rubino; Antonello Forgione; David E Cummings; Michel Vix; Donatella Gnuli; Geltrude Mingrone; Marco Castagneto; Jacques Marescaux Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Melinda A Maggard; Lisa R Shugarman; Marika Suttorp; Margaret Maglione; Harvey J Sugerman; Harvey J Sugarman; Edward H Livingston; Ninh T Nguyen; Zhaoping Li; Walter A Mojica; Lara Hilton; Shannon Rhodes; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2005-04-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Carel W le Roux; Simon J B Aylwin; Rachel L Batterham; Cynthia M Borg; Frances Coyle; Vyas Prasad; Sandra Shurey; Mohammad A Ghatei; Ameet G Patel; Stephen R Bloom Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: M Martín; M A Burrell; J Gómez-Ambrosi; V Valentí; Á Bueno; B Ramírez; S Becerril; A Lancha; P del Sol Calderón; L Méndez-Giménez; V Catalán; A Rodríguez; S Fernández; M Muñoz-Navas; J A Cienfuegos; G Frühbeck Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Víctor Valentí; Marina Martín; Beatriz Ramírez; Javier Gómez-Ambrosi; Amaia Rodríguez; Victoria Catalán; Sara Becerril; Andoni Lancha; Secundino Fernández; Javier A Cienfuegos; María A Burrell; Gema Frühbeck Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Victoria Catalán; Javier Gómez-Ambrosi; Amaia Lizanzu; Amaia Rodríguez; Camilo Silva; Fernando Rotellar; María J Gil; Javier A Cienfuegos; Javier Salvador; Gema Frühbeck Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 4.129