Literature DB >> 18854711

Measuring menstrual discomfort: a comparison of interview and diary data.

Anne Marie Zaura Jukic1, Clarice R Weinberg, Donna D Baird, Paige P Hornsby, Allen J Wilcox.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Menstrual discomfort is common among women of reproductive age and can be debilitating. The accuracy of self-report of menstrual discomfort is unknown.
METHODS: At enrollment into the DES Reproductive Health Study in 1990, premenopausal women classified their frequency of any menstrual discomfort as "always," "often," "sometimes," and "never." Subsequently, women provided daily diary information for up to 6 months regarding any menstrual discomfort and medication used for menstrual pain.
RESULTS: A total of 324 women contributed data on 4 or more menstrual cycles in the prospective study. At enrollment, 10% had reported never having menstrual discomfort. Of these, 65% recorded at least 1 day of menstrual discomfort during follow-up. For the 27% who had reported always having discomfort, 88% recorded discomfort in all cycles. The enrollment statement of discomfort was more strongly correlated with the percentage of cycles in which women took medication for menstrual pain; respondents who said they never had menstrual discomfort reported use of pain medication in 3% of cycles; sometimes, 36%; often, 67%; and always, 92%. The average number of days per cycle with prospectively recorded menstrual discomfort was also correlated with the enrollment response.
CONCLUSIONS: A single question regarding frequency of menstrual discomfort was positively correlated with prospectively recorded menstrual discomfort and especially with pain requiring medication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18854711      PMCID: PMC2650252          DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318187ac9e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  27 in total

1.  Lessons learned about research on premenstrual syndrome.

Authors:  M N Miller; K R McGowen; B E Miller; B R Coyle; R Hamdy
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  1999-09

2.  Assessing the assessment measures for menstrual cycle symptoms: a guide for researchers and clinicians.

Authors:  A Haywood; P Slade; H King
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  An attributional approach to moods and the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  R W Koeske; G F Koeske
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1975-03

4.  Variability of momentary pain predicts recall of weekly pain: a consequence of the peak (or salience) memory heuristic.

Authors:  Arthur A Stone; Joseph E Schwartz; Joan E Broderick; Saul S Shiffman
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-10

Review 5.  Memory for labor pain: a review of the literature.

Authors:  C A Niven; T Murphy-Black
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.689

6.  Women's beliefs about the prevalence of premenstrual syndrome and biases in recall of premenstrual changes.

Authors:  M L Marván; S Cortés-Iniestra
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Plasma prostaglandin F 2-alpha levels in dysmenorrehic women.

Authors:  M M Shangold; S Aksel; D W Schomberg; C B Hammond
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Premenstrual symptoms: a reinterpretation.

Authors:  D N Ruble
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Determination of menstrual prostaglandin levels in non-dysmenorrheic and dysmenorrheic subjects.

Authors:  W Y Chan; J C Hill
Journal:  Prostaglandins       Date:  1978-02

10.  Memory for stress-associated acute pain.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Gedney; Henrietta Logan
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.820

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sleep quality and acute pain severity among young adults with and without chronic pain: the role of biobehavioral factors.

Authors:  Jennifer E Graham; Katherine L Streitel
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-05-13

2.  Soy-based infant formula feeding and menstrual pain in a cohort of women aged 23-35 years.

Authors:  Kristen Upson; Margaret A Adgent; Ganesa Wegienka; Donna D Baird
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  A U-Shaped Relationship between Body Mass Index and Dysmenorrhea: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Hong Ju; Mark Jones; Gita D Mishra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.