OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of prehypertension and the prevalence and treatment of hypertension in a family practice population. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: An academic family practice unit. PARTICIPANTS: Practice patients aged 30 to 80 years who had visited the clinic at least once during the 2 years before the study and had at least 1 blood pressure (BP) measurement recorded on their charts during that time period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Most recent BP recorded on the chart; presence or absence of a diagnosis of hypertension recorded on the chart; number and class of prescribed antihypertensive medications. RESULTS: Of the 1388 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 389 had a diagnosis of hypertension. Of the 999 who did not have a diagnosis of hypertension, 306 (30.6%) met the criteria for prehypertension used in this study (systolic BP of 130 to 139 mm Hg or diastolic BP of 85 to 89 mm Hg). Men and older patients (60 to 80 years of age) were more likely to have prehypertension than other patients were. Of the patients with hypertension, 254 (65%) had achieved a BP level of < 140/90 mm Hg. The majority of hypertensive patients were prescribed 1 or 2 medications. Only 4.5% were using more than 2 different medications. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of a family practice's patients need close surveillance of BP because of the prevalence of prehypertension. Despite the improvement in the management of hypertension, only 65% of hypertensive patients had achieved the recommended target BP. Family physicians could be treating their hypertensive patients more aggressively with medications; only 4.4% of patients were using more than 2 different antihypertensive medications, despite 35% not being at target. Hypertension surveillance and treatment to achieve target BP levels continue to be important issues in primary care.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of prehypertension and the prevalence and treatment of hypertension in a family practice population. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: An academic family practice unit. PARTICIPANTS: Practice patients aged 30 to 80 years who had visited the clinic at least once during the 2 years before the study and had at least 1 blood pressure (BP) measurement recorded on their charts during that time period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Most recent BP recorded on the chart; presence or absence of a diagnosis of hypertension recorded on the chart; number and class of prescribed antihypertensive medications. RESULTS: Of the 1388 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 389 had a diagnosis of hypertension. Of the 999 who did not have a diagnosis of hypertension, 306 (30.6%) met the criteria for prehypertension used in this study (systolic BP of 130 to 139 mm Hg or diastolic BP of 85 to 89 mm Hg). Men and older patients (60 to 80 years of age) were more likely to have prehypertension than other patients were. Of the patients with hypertension, 254 (65%) had achieved a BP level of < 140/90 mm Hg. The majority of hypertensivepatients were prescribed 1 or 2 medications. Only 4.5% were using more than 2 different medications. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of a family practice's patients need close surveillance of BP because of the prevalence of prehypertension. Despite the improvement in the management of hypertension, only 65% of hypertensivepatients had achieved the recommended target BP. Family physicians could be treating their hypertensivepatients more aggressively with medications; only 4.4% of patients were using more than 2 different antihypertensive medications, despite 35% not being at target. Hypertension surveillance and treatment to achieve target BP levels continue to be important issues in primary care.
Authors: Majid Ezzati; Alan D Lopez; Anthony Rodgers; Stephen Vander Hoorn; Christopher J L Murray Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-11-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ying Zhang; Elisa T Lee; Richard B Devereux; Jeunliang Yeh; Lyle G Best; Richard R Fabsitz; Barbara V Howard Journal: Hypertension Date: 2006-01-30 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Stevo Julius; Shawna D Nesbitt; Brent M Egan; Michael A Weber; Eric L Michelson; Niko Kaciroti; Henry R Black; Richard H Grimm; Franz H Messerli; Suzanne Oparil; M Anthony Schork Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-03-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nathan D Wong; Gaurav Thakral; Stanley S Franklin; Gil J L'Italien; Milagros J Jacobs; Joanna L Whyte; Pablo Lapuerta Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Norman R C Campbell; Janusz Kaczorowski; Richard Z Lewanczuk; Ross Feldman; Luc Poirier; Margaret Moy Kwong; Marcel Lebel; Finlay A McAlister; Sheldon W Tobe Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 5.223