CONTEXT: Aberrant histone deacetylase activity is seen in a variety of malignancies, and histone deacetylase inhibitors such as vorinostat have been shown to induce cell death and sensitize cells to cytotoxic chemotherapy in thyroid cancer cell lines. This phase II study was undertaken to assess objective response to vorinostat in patients with advanced thyroid cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A total of 19 patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (n = 16) and medullary thyroid cancer (n = 3) were enrolled in the study. Patients received oral vorinostat at a starting dose of 200 mg twice daily, with dose adjustments allowed as necessary for toxicity. Patients were treated for 2 wk, followed by 1 wk off therapy (3-wk cycle) until disease progression or study withdrawal. Responses were measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria and correlated with tumor markers. RESULTS: No patient achieved a partial or complete response. Median duration of therapy in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer was 17 wk, whereas in medullary thyroid cancer patients it was 25 wk. Reasons for termination included progression of disease by RECIST criteria (n = 7), clinical progression (n = 3), and adverse events (AEs) (n = 9). AEs were primarily grade 1-3; no clinical grade 4 or grade 5 events were observed. Clinical grade 3 AEs consisted of fatigue, dehydration, ataxia, pneumonia, bruises, and deep vein thrombosis. Severe thrombocytopenia was seen in seven patients (grade 3, n = 5; grade 4, n = 2) and was associated with minor bleeding or bruises. CONCLUSIONS: Vorinostat at this dose and schedule is not an effective treatment for advanced thyroid cancer.
CONTEXT: Aberrant histone deacetylase activity is seen in a variety of malignancies, and histone deacetylase inhibitors such as vorinostat have been shown to induce cell death and sensitize cells to cytotoxic chemotherapy in thyroid cancer cell lines. This phase II study was undertaken to assess objective response to vorinostat in patients with advanced thyroid cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A total of 19 patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (n = 16) and medullary thyroid cancer (n = 3) were enrolled in the study. Patients received oral vorinostat at a starting dose of 200 mg twice daily, with dose adjustments allowed as necessary for toxicity. Patients were treated for 2 wk, followed by 1 wk off therapy (3-wk cycle) until disease progression or study withdrawal. Responses were measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria and correlated with tumor markers. RESULTS: No patient achieved a partial or complete response. Median duration of therapy in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer was 17 wk, whereas in medullary thyroid cancerpatients it was 25 wk. Reasons for termination included progression of disease by RECIST criteria (n = 7), clinical progression (n = 3), and adverse events (AEs) (n = 9). AEs were primarily grade 1-3; no clinical grade 4 or grade 5 events were observed. Clinical grade 3 AEs consisted of fatigue, dehydration, ataxia, pneumonia, bruises, and deep vein thrombosis. Severe thrombocytopenia was seen in seven patients (grade 3, n = 5; grade 4, n = 2) and was associated with minor bleeding or bruises. CONCLUSIONS:Vorinostat at this dose and schedule is not an effective treatment for advanced thyroid cancer.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: M Kitazono; R Robey; Z Zhan; N J Sarlis; M C Skarulis; T Aikou; S Bates; T Fojo Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: J Gilbert; S D Baker; M K Bowling; L Grochow; W D Figg; Y Zabelina; R C Donehower; M A Carducci Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: R L Piekarz; R Robey; V Sandor; S Bakke; W H Wilson; L Dahmoush; D M Kingma; M L Turner; R Altemus; S E Bates Journal: Blood Date: 2001-11-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Steven D Gore; Li-Jun Weng; William D Figg; Suoping Zhai; Ross C Donehower; George Dover; Michael R Grever; Constance Griffin; Louise B Grochow; Anita Hawkins; Kathleen Burks; Yelena Zabelena; Carole B Miller Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Rasa Zarnegar; Laurent Brunaud; Hajima Kanauchi; Mariwil Wong; Mami Fung; David Ginzinger; Quan-Yang Duh; Orlo H Clark Journal: Surgery Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: George R Blumenschein; Merrill S Kies; Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou; Charles Lu; Ashok J Kumar; Justin L Ricker; Judy H Chiao; Cong Chen; Stanley R Frankel Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2007-10-25 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Geneviève Dom; Vanessa Chico Galdo; Maxime Tarabichi; Gil Tomás; Aline Hébrant; Guy Andry; Viviane De Martelar; Frédérick Libert; Emmanuelle Leteurtre; Jacques E Dumont; Carine Maenhaut; Wilma C G van Staveren Journal: Thyroid Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Jesse J McClure; Cheng Zhang; Elizabeth S Inks; Yuri K Peterson; Jiaying Li; C James Chou Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2016-10-26 Impact factor: 7.446