Literature DB >> 18853302

Identification of mechanisms of toxic action for skin sensitisation using a SMARTS pattern based approach.

S J Enoch1, J C Madden, M T D Cronin.   

Abstract

Skin sensitisation is a key endpoint under REACH as it is costly and its assessment currently has a high dependency on animal testing. In order to reduce both the cost and the numbers of animals tested, it is likely that (quantitative) structure-activity relationships ((Q)SAR) and read-across methods will be utilised as part of intelligent testing strategies. The majority of skin sensitisers elicit their effect via covalent bond formation with skin proteins. These reactions have been understood in terms of well defined nucleophilic-electrophilic reaction chemistry. Thus, a first step in (Q)SAR analysis is the assignment of a chemical's potential mechanism of action enabling it to be placed in an appropriate reactivity domain. The aim of this study was to design a series of SMARTS patterns capable of defining these reactivity domains. This was carried out using a large database of local lymph node assay (LLNA) results that had had potential mechanisms of action assigned to them using expert knowledge. A simple algorithm was written enabling the SMARTS patterns to be used to screen a database of SMILES strings. The SMARTS patterns were then evaluated using a second, smaller, test set of LLNA results which had also had potential mechanisms of action assigned by experts. The results showed that the SMARTS patterns provided an excellent method of identifying potential electrophilic mechanisms. The findings are supported, in part, by molecular orbital calculations which confirm assignment of reactive mechanism of action. The ability to define a chemical's potential reaction mechanism is likely to be of significant benefit to regulators and risk assessors as it enables category formation and subsequent read-across to be performed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18853302     DOI: 10.1080/10629360802348985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res        ISSN: 1026-776X            Impact factor:   3.000


  14 in total

1.  Application of IATA - A case study in evaluating the global and local performance of a Bayesian network model for skin sensitization.

Authors:  J M Fitzpatrick; G Patlewicz
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Integrated in silico approaches for the prediction of Ames test mutagenicity.

Authors:  Sandeep Modi; Jin Li; Sophie Malcomber; Claire Moore; Andrew Scott; Andrew White; Paul Carmichael
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Application of the hard and soft, acids and bases (HSAB) theory as a method to predict cumulative neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Fjodor Melnikov; Brian C Geohagen; Terrence Gavin; Richard M LoPachin; Paul T Anastas; Phillip Coish; David W Herr
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.294

4.  Skin sensitization in silico protocol.

Authors:  Candice Johnson; Ernst Ahlberg; Lennart T Anger; Lisa Beilke; Romualdo Benigni; Joel Bercu; Sol Bobst; David Bower; Alessandro Brigo; Sarah Campbell; Mark T D Cronin; Ian Crooks; Kevin P Cross; Tatyana Doktorova; Thomas Exner; David Faulkner; Ian M Fearon; Markus Fehr; Shayne C Gad; Véronique Gervais; Amanda Giddings; Susanne Glowienke; Barry Hardy; Catrin Hasselgren; Jedd Hillegass; Robert Jolly; Eckart Krupp; Liat Lomnitski; Jason Magby; Jordi Mestres; Lawrence Milchak; Scott Miller; Wolfgang Muster; Louise Neilson; Rahul Parakhia; Alexis Parenty; Patricia Parris; Alexandre Paulino; Ana Theresa Paulino; David W Roberts; Harald Schlecker; Reinhard Stidl; Diana Suarez-Rodrigez; David T Szabo; Raymond R Tice; Daniel Urbisch; Anna Vuorinen; Brian Wall; Thibaud Weiler; Angela T White; Jessica Whritenour; Joerg Wichard; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 5.  In Silico Models for Skin Sensitization and Irritation.

Authors:  Gianluca Selvestrel; Federica Robino; Matteo Zanotti Russo
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  Global QSAR models of skin sensitisers for regulatory purposes.

Authors:  Qasim Chaudhry; Nadège Piclin; Jane Cotterill; Marco Pintore; Nick R Price; Jacques R Chrétien; Alessandra Roncaglioni
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.215

7.  Cytotoxicity and Pro-/Anti-inflammatory Properties of Cinnamates, Acrylates and Methacrylates Against RAW264.7 Cells.

Authors:  Yukio Murakami; Akifumi Kawata; Seiji Suzuki; Seiichiro Fujisawa
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  ToxAlerts: a Web server of structural alerts for toxic chemicals and compounds with potential adverse reactions.

Authors:  Iurii Sushko; Elena Salmina; Vladimir A Potemkin; Gennadiy Poda; Igor V Tetko
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Modeling skin sensitization potential of mechanistically hard-to-be-classified aniline and phenol compounds with quantum mechanistic properties.

Authors:  Qin Ouyang; Lirong Wang; Ying Mu; Xiang-Qun Xie
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.483

10.  Systematic benchmark of substructure search in molecular graphs - From Ullmann to VF2.

Authors:  Hans-Christian Ehrlich; Matthias Rarey
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 5.514

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.