Literature DB >> 18853287

The efficacy of non-pharmacological methods of pain management in school-age children receiving venepuncture in a paediatric department: a randomized controlled trial of audiovisual distraction and routine psychological intervention.

Zi-Xuan Wang1, Li-Hui Sun, Ai-Ping Chen.   

Abstract

QUESTIONS UNDER STUDY/PRINCIPLES: Non-pharmacologic analgesia has been demonstrated to alleviate pain and distress in invasive procedures. Nevertheless, the practice has not been adopted widely in paediatric departments because nurses are often too busy to perform a time consuming procedure.
METHODS: Three hundred patients (8-9 years) requiring venepuncture for intravenous treatment were randomized into audiovisual distraction group (n = 100, watching cartoon films), intervention group (n = 100, receiving psychological intervention) and control group (n = 100, without any intervention).
RESULTS: There was no significant difference (P>0.05) between the audiovisual distraction and the intervention groups for cooperation, venepuncture times and pain intensity (assessed with visual analogue scale, VAS). However, cooperation in the control group was more passive than in the intervention group (P <0.05) but not apparently different to the audiovisual distraction group (P >0.05). Venepuncture time was significantly higher in the control group than in the other two groups (P <0.05). Venepuncture caused moderate pain in children (VAS score: 5.22 +/- 2.53 in the control group). VAS scores indicated that procedures were more painful in the control group than in the audiovisual distraction or the intervention group (VAS score: 4.55 +/- 2.26 and 4.38 +/- 2.32 in the audiovisual distraction and intervention groups respectively, P <0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Audiovisual distraction was demonstrated to be effective in reducing self-reported pain, improving patient cooperation and increasing success rate in venepuncture procedures and was as successful as routine psychological intervention. It is highly recommended as an effective, labour saving and easy to administer analgesia and should be used to help prevent pain from venepuncture in school age children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18853287     DOI: 2008/39/smw-12224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly        ISSN: 0036-7672            Impact factor:   2.193


  5 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of distraction and hypnosis for needle-related pain and distress in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Kathryn A Birnie; Melanie Noel; Jennifer A Parker; Christine T Chambers; Lindsay S Uman; Steve R Kisely; Patrick J McGrath
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2014-06-02

2.  The Impact of Virtual Reality Distraction on Pain and Anxiety during Dental Treatment in 4-6 Year-Old Children: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Naser Asl Aminabadi; Leila Erfanparast; Azin Sohrabi; Sina Ghertasi Oskouei; Armaghan Naghili
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2012-11-12

3.  Effects of audiovisual distraction on children's behaviour during dental treatment: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Amal Al-Khotani; Lanre A'aziz Bello; Nikolaos Christidis
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  Comparison between the analgesic effectiveness and patients' preference for virtual reality vs. topical anesthesia gel during the administration of local anesthesia in adult dental patients: a randomized clinical study.

Authors:  May Almugait; Ammar AbuMostafa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Kathryn A Birnie; Melanie Noel; Christine T Chambers; Lindsay S Uman; Jennifer A Parker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.