INTRODUCTION: Chronic renal failure (CRF) and renal replacement treatments have a negative effect on sexual function and quality of life (QoL). The literature on female sexual dysfunction (FSD) in patients with CRF is limited. The aim of this study is to compare the sexual function and QoL in predialysis (PreD), dialysis, and transplant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 106 women including 21 PreD, 45 dialysis, 20 renal transplantation (Tx), and 20 control patients were enrolled in the study. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and SF-36 scales were used to assess all patients, and demographic and clinical variables were documented. The FSFI and QoL scale scores were compared among the groups. RESULTS: The rates of FSD were 50, 81, 66.7, 75, and 50% in the control, PreD, peritoneal dialysis (PD), hemodialysis (HD) and Tx patients respectively. Total FSFI scores for desire, arousal and orgasm scores in the PreD group were significantly lower than those in Tx and control patients (P < 0.05). Physical components of QoL in CRF patients were significantly worse than in the control group (P < 0.0001). On logistic regression analysis, age, glucose and creatinine were significantly associated with FSD. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study documented that Tx is the most effective way to retain good sexual function in women, and a diagnosis of FSD should be made routinely in CRF patients.
INTRODUCTION:Chronic renal failure (CRF) and renal replacement treatments have a negative effect on sexual function and quality of life (QoL). The literature on female sexual dysfunction (FSD) in patients with CRF is limited. The aim of this study is to compare the sexual function and QoL in predialysis (PreD), dialysis, and transplant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 106 women including 21 PreD, 45 dialysis, 20 renal transplantation (Tx), and 20 control patients were enrolled in the study. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and SF-36 scales were used to assess all patients, and demographic and clinical variables were documented. The FSFI and QoL scale scores were compared among the groups. RESULTS: The rates of FSD were 50, 81, 66.7, 75, and 50% in the control, PreD, peritoneal dialysis (PD), hemodialysis (HD) and Tx patients respectively. Total FSFI scores for desire, arousal and orgasm scores in the PreD group were significantly lower than those in Tx and control patients (P < 0.05). Physical components of QoL in CRF patients were significantly worse than in the control group (P < 0.0001). On logistic regression analysis, age, glucose and creatinine were significantly associated with FSD. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study documented that Tx is the most effective way to retain good sexual function in women, and a diagnosis of FSD should be made routinely in CRF patients.
Authors: N Ghahramani; A Behzadi; S Gholami; H Salahi; G A Rais-Jalali; S A Malek-Hosseini; E Ahmad; S Behzadi; P Jan-Ghorban Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: Eduard A Iliescu; Helen Coo; Margo H McMurray; Carol L Meers; Margo M Quinn; Michael A Singer; Wilma M Hopman Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: M A Dew; G E Switzer; J M Goycoolea; A S Allen; A DiMartini; R L Kormos; B P Griffith Journal: Transplantation Date: 1997-11-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Albert W Wu; Nancy E Fink; Jane V R Marsh-Manzi; Klemens B Meyer; Frederic O Finkelstein; Michelle M Chapman; Neil R Powe Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Giovanni F M Strippoli; Mariacristina Vecchio; Suetonia Palmer; Giorgia De Berardis; Jonathan Craig; Giuseppe Lucisano; David Johnson; Fabio Pellegrini; Antonio Nicolucci; Michela Sciancalepore; Valeria Saglimbene; Letizia Gargano; Carmen Bonifati; Marinella Ruospo; Sankar D Navaneethan; Vincenzo Montinaro; Paul Stroumza; Marianna Zsom; Mariatta Torok; Eduardo Celia; Ruben Gelfman; Anna Bednarek-Skublewska; Jan Dulawa; Giusi Graziano; Giorgio Gentile; Juan Nin Ferrari; Antonio Santoro; Annalisa Zucchelli; Giorgio Triolo; Stefano Maffei; Jörgen Hegbrant; Charlotta Wollheim; Salvatore De Cosmo; Valeria M Manfreda Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-04-05 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Andrea L Oliverio; Jennifer L Bragg-Gresham; Lindsay K Admon; Julie A Wright Nunes; Rajiv Saran; Michael Heung Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Tanjala S Purnell; Priscilla Auguste; Deidra C Crews; Julio Lamprea-Montealegre; Temitope Olufade; Raquel Greer; Patti Ephraim; Johanna Sheu; Daniel Kostecki; Neil R Powe; Hamid Rabb; Bernard Jaar; L Ebony Boulware Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 8.860