Literature DB >> 18852867

Interpretative commenting.

Samuel Vasikaran1.   

Abstract

* Clinical laboratories should be able to offer interpretation of the results they produce. * At a minimum, contact details for interpretative advice should be available on laboratory reports.Interpretative comments may be verbal or written and printed. * Printed comments on reports should be offered judiciously, only where they would add value; no comment preferred to inappropriate or dangerous comment. * Interpretation should be based on locally agreed or nationally recognised clinical guidelines where available. * Standard tied comments ("canned" comments) can have some limited use.Individualised narrative comments may be particularly useful in the case of tests that are new, complex or unfamiliar to the requesting clinicians and where clinical details are available. * Interpretative commenting should only be provided by appropriately trained and credentialed personnel. * Audit of comments and continued professional development of personnel providing them are important for quality assurance.

Year:  2008        PMID: 18852867      PMCID: PMC2556593     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev        ISSN: 0159-8090


  6 in total

1.  Provision of interpretative comments on biochemical report forms.

Authors:  W J Marshall; G S Challand
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.057

2.  Patient-specific narrative interpretations of complex clinical laboratory evaluations: who is competent to provide them?

Authors:  Michael Laposata
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 3.  Technology to improve quality and accountability.

Authors:  Jonathan Kay
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  The assessment of interpretation in clinical biochemistry: a personal view.

Authors:  G S Challand; S D Vasikaran
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.057

5.  Review of a pilot quality-assessment program for interpretative comments.

Authors:  S D Vasikaran; L Penberthy; J Gill; S Scott; K A Sikaris
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.057

6.  Quality assessment of interpretative commenting in clinical chemistry.

Authors:  Ee Mun Lim; Ken A Sikaris; Janice Gill; John Calleja; Peter E Hickman; John Beilby; Samuel D Vasikaran
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.327

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Biochemistry on the human scale.

Authors:  Ken Sikaris
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2010-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.