Literature DB >> 18852865

Significant figures.

Tony Badrick1, Peter E Hickman.   

Abstract

* For consistency of reporting the same number of significant figures should be used for results and reference intervals. * The choice of the reporting interval should be based on analytical imprecision (measurement uncertainty).

Year:  2008        PMID： 18852865      PMCID： PMC2556591     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev        ISSN： 0159-8090


  4 in total

1.  Objective determination of appropriate reporting intervals.

Authors:  Tony Badrick; Susan R Wilson; Goce Dimeski; Peter E Hickman
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.057

2.  Over-reporting significant figures--a significant problem?

Authors:  Robert C Hawkins; Tony Badrick; Peter E Hickman
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2006-06-10       Impact factor: 3.786

3.  The significance of significant figures.

Authors:  R C Hawkins; R N Johnson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Effect of the reporting-interval size on critical difference estimation: beyond "2.77".

Authors:  Graham Ross Dallas Jones
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 8.327
  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Harmonising adult and paediatric reference intervals in australia and new zealand: an evidence-based approach for establishing a first panel of chemistry analytes.

Authors:  Jillian R Tate; Ken A Sikaris; Graham Rd Jones; Tina Yen; Gus Koerbin; Julie Ryan; Maxine Reed; Janice Gill; George Koumantakis; Peter Hickman; Peter Graham
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2014-11

2.  The significance of reporting to the thousandths place: Figuring out the laboratory limitations.

Authors:  Joely A Straseski; Casey Whale; Andrew Wilson; Frederick G Strathmann
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2016-11-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.