Literature DB >> 18852620

Development and initial validation of a multi-domain self-report measure of work functioning.

Sarah Ring-Kurtz1, Mary Beth Connolly Gibbons, John E Kurtz, Robert Gallop, Julie Present, Paul Crits-Christoph.   

Abstract

The need for a self-report measure of work functioning that is flexible to involvement in work across 3 domains (employment, school, and home) led to the development of the Work History Inventory (WHI). The WHI was administered to 185 patients who participated in psychotherapy studies and to 110 community control respondents who were not in treatment. The WHI Total score and subscales (Performance and Interpersonal) demonstrated adequate to good reliability. WHI scores correlated moderately with symptom measures and strongly with another work functioning measure. Changes across treatment indicated that the WHI Total and Performance scores increased significantly across psychotherapy. The WHI seems to be a reliable and valid instrument for measuring treatment related changes in work functioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18852620      PMCID: PMC2782633          DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181879dc2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis        ISSN: 0022-3018            Impact factor:   2.254


  28 in total

1.  The Life Functioning Questionnaire (LFQ): a brief, gender-neutral scale assessing functional outcome.

Authors:  Lori Altshuler; Jim Mintz; Kristin Leight
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 3.222

2.  The multidimensional scale of independent functioning: a new instrument for measuring functional disability in psychiatric populations.

Authors:  Judith Jaeger; Stefanie M Berns; Pál Czobor
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Assessing psychiatric impairment in primary care with the Sheehan Disability Scale.

Authors:  A C Leon; M Olfson; L Portera; L Farber; D V Sheehan
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Med       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.210

4.  An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties.

Authors:  A T Beck; N Epstein; G Brown; R A Steer
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1988-12

5.  Does self-perceived mood predict more variance in cognitive performance than clinician-rated symptoms in schizophrenia?

Authors:  Rozmin Halari; Ravi Mehrotra; Tonmoy Sharma; Veena Kumari
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Developing brief scales for use in clinical practice: the reliability and validity of single-item self-report measures of depression symptom severity, psychosocial impairment due to depression, and quality of life.

Authors:  Mark Zimmerman; Camilo J Ruggero; Iwona Chelminski; Diane Young; Michael A Posternak; Michael Friedman; Daniela Boerescu; Naureen Attiullah
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.384

7.  Depressive symptoms reduced in individuals with HIV/AIDS treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  F K Judd; A M Cockram; A Komiti; A M Mijch; J Hoy; R Bell
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.744

8.  Maternal affective disorders, illness, and stress: risk for children's psychopathology.

Authors:  C Hammen; D Gordon; D Burge; C Adrian; C Jaenicke; D Hiroto
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Evaluating the capacity to work of the mentally ill.

Authors:  H K Massel; R P Liberman; J Mintz; H E Jacobs; T V Rush; C A Giannini; R Zarate
Journal:  Psychiatry       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.458

10.  A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.

Authors:  J B Williams
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1988-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  Measuring Work Functioning: Validity of a Weighted Composite Work Functioning Approach.

Authors:  Edwin J Boezeman; Judith K Sluiter; Karen Nieuwenhuijsen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.