Literature DB >> 18852206

Genome-based prediction of common diseases: advances and prospects.

A Cecile J W Janssens1, Cornelia M van Duijn.   

Abstract

Common diseases such as type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease result from a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Recent developments in genomics research have boosted progress in the discovery of susceptibility genes and fueled expectations about opportunities of genetic profiling for personalizing medicine. Personalized medicine requires a test that fairly accurately predicts disease risk, particularly when interventions are invasive, expensive or have major side effects. Recent studies on the prediction of common diseases based on multiple genetic variants alone or in addition to traditional disease risk factors showed limited predictive value so far, but all have investigated only a limited number of susceptibility variants. New gene discoveries from genome-wide association studies will certainly further improve the prediction of common diseases, but the question is whether this improvement is sufficient to enable personalized medicine. In this paper, we argue that new gene discoveries may not evidently improve the prediction of common diseases to a degree that it will change the management of individuals at increased risk. Substantial improvements may only be expected if we manage to understand the complete causal mechanisms of common diseases to a similar extent as we understand those of monogenic disorders. Genomics research will contribute to this understanding, but it is likely that the complexity of complex diseases may ultimately limit the opportunities for accurate prediction of disease in asymptomatic individuals as unraveling their complete causal pathways may be impossible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18852206     DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddn250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  123 in total

1.  Consistency of genome-wide associations across major ancestral groups.

Authors:  Evangelia E Ntzani; George Liberopoulos; Teri A Manolio; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Reversing T cell immunosenescence: why, who, and how.

Authors:  Pierre Olivier Lang; Sheila Govind; Richard Aspinall
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2012-02-26

3.  Points to consider in assessing and appraising predictive genetic tests.

Authors:  Wolf H Rogowski; Scott D Grosse; Jürgen John; Helena Kääriäinen; Alastair Kent; Ulf Kristofferson; Jörg Schmidtke
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2010-10-16

4.  Analytical and simulation methods for estimating the potential predictive ability of genetic profiling: a comparison of methods and results.

Authors:  Suman Kundu; Lennart C Karssen; A Cecile J W Janssens
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Inclusion of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions unlikely to dramatically improve risk prediction for complex diseases.

Authors:  Hugues Aschard; Jinbo Chen; Marilyn C Cornelis; Lori B Chibnik; Elizabeth W Karlson; Peter Kraft
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing.

Authors:  Theo Meuwissen; Mike Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Lifestyle-related disease in Crohn's disease: relapse prevention by a semi-vegetarian diet.

Authors:  Mitsuro Chiba; Toru Abe; Hidehiko Tsuda; Takeshi Sugawara; Satoko Tsuda; Haruhiko Tozawa; Katsuhiko Fujiwara; Hideo Imai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Genome-wide association studies and large-scale collaborations in epidemiology.

Authors:  Bruce M Psaty; Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Why significant variables aren't automatically good predictors.

Authors:  Adeline Lo; Herman Chernoff; Tian Zheng; Shaw-Hwa Lo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Principle of proportionality in genomic data sharing.

Authors:  Caroline F Wright; Matthew E Hurles; Helen V Firth
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.