Literature DB >> 18850504

Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine at 3 Tesla.

Peter Fries1, Val M Runge, Miles A Kirchin, David M Watkins, Arno Buecker, Guenther Schneider.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has developed dramatically in the 25 years since its clinical introduction. Advances in hardware design have included the development of high field magnets and more sophisticated and sensitive coils. Improvements in sequences, data sampling, and postprocessing software have benefited the attainable spatial and temporal resolution to the point at which the fine depiction of anatomical structure and pathological processes is now routine. As in other radiological areas, the most recent advances in MRI have proven highly valuable in the field of musculoskeletal radiology where the lack of radiation, high soft tissue contrast, and capacity for multiplanar or three-dimensional imaging have made MRI the imaging modality of choice. Particular benefits are seen in diagnostic imaging of the spine where MRI is clearly superior to both conventional radiography and computed tomography. In this article, we discuss the impact of the most recent technological advance in MRI, namely the advent of 3 Tesla (3-T) imaging, on diagnostic imaging of the spine. Comparisons are drawn with imaging at 1.5 T, and emphasis is placed on MR physics and on the benefits and principal difficulties associated with spine imaging at high field strength.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18850504     DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1083107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol        ISSN: 1089-7860            Impact factor:   1.777


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Biochemical magnetic resonance imaging of intervertebral discs and facet joints].

Authors:  D Stelzeneder; S Trattnig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Three-dimensional morphological and signal intensity features for detection of intervertebral disc degeneration from magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  A Neubert; J Fripp; C Engstrom; D Walker; M-A Weber; R Schwarz; S Crozier
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  [Degenerative diseases of the spine].

Authors:  K I Schmidt; J Viera; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  A prospective comparison study of fast T1 weighted fluid attenuation inversion recovery and T1 weighted turbo spin echo sequence at 3 T in degenerative disease of the cervical spine.

Authors:  K Ganesan; G M Bydder
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  [Spinal tumors].

Authors:  F J Ahlhelm; P Fries; A Nabhan; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Prevalence of disc degeneration in asymptomatic korean subjects. Part 1 : lumbar spine.

Authors:  Sang Jin Kim; Tae Hoon Lee; Soo Mee Lim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-01-31

7.  Comparison of Sagittal FSE T2, STIR, and T1-Weighted Phase-Sensitive Inversion Recovery in the Detection of Spinal Cord Lesions in MS at 3T.

Authors:  P Alcaide-Leon; A Pauranik; L Alshafai; S Rawal; J Oh; W Montanera; G Leung; A Bharatha
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Quantitative 23 Na-MRI of the intervertebral disk at 3 T.

Authors:  Mustafa Çavuşoğlu; Shila Pazahr; Alexander P Ciritsis; Cristina Rossi
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.478

9.  Prevalence of disc degeneration in asymptomatic korean subjects. Part 2 : cervical spine.

Authors:  Tae Hoon Lee; Sang Jin Kim; Soo Mee Lim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-02-28

10.  Reference values for the cervical spinal canal and the vertebral bodies by MRI in a general population.

Authors:  Christopher Nell; Robin Bülow; Norbert Hosten; Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Katrin Hegenscheid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.