OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the differences in systemic vascular and endothelial function in response to acute mental stress between men and women. The endothelium plays a pivotal role in vascular homeostasis and the development of atherosclerotic heart disease. The mechanism and presentation of cardiovascular events show a sex-based difference, although the sex difference in the vascular and endothelial response to mental stress is not known. METHODS: Male (n = 34) and female (n = 53) subjects participated in a series of three different mental stress tasks during which vascular response was measured non-invasively using peripheral arterial tonometry. Endothelial function was assessed using reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry. Double product (systolic blood pressure x heart rate) was calculated. RESULTS: Males had a greater double product response (27.2 + 3.6% increase in double product vs. 19.2 + 1.7%; P = 0.01), and a greater vascular reactivity to mental stress. Females demonstrated a reduced response to reactive hyperemia (-0.47 vs. 13.74%; P = 0.01). Furthermore, a subgroup of females who showed the least vaso-reactivity to mental stress showed the greatest decline in endothelial function (-10.5 + 4% vs. 17.4 + 6.3%; P < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: This study demonstrates sex-based differences in the vascular and endothelial responses to mental stress. The mental stress-induced reduction in endothelial function and increased double product seen in the females might manifest clinically as contributing to the pathophysiology of mental stress-mediated cardiovascular events in female patients and provide further information regarding the potential mechanism for sex differences in cardiac events.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the differences in systemic vascular and endothelial function in response to acute mental stress between men and women. The endothelium plays a pivotal role in vascular homeostasis and the development of atherosclerotic heart disease. The mechanism and presentation of cardiovascular events show a sex-based difference, although the sex difference in the vascular and endothelial response to mental stress is not known. METHODS: Male (n = 34) and female (n = 53) subjects participated in a series of three different mental stress tasks during which vascular response was measured non-invasively using peripheral arterial tonometry. Endothelial function was assessed using reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry. Double product (systolic blood pressure x heart rate) was calculated. RESULTS: Males had a greater double product response (27.2 + 3.6% increase in double product vs. 19.2 + 1.7%; P = 0.01), and a greater vascular reactivity to mental stress. Females demonstrated a reduced response to reactive hyperemia (-0.47 vs. 13.74%; P = 0.01). Furthermore, a subgroup of females who showed the least vaso-reactivity to mental stress showed the greatest decline in endothelial function (-10.5 + 4% vs. 17.4 + 6.3%; P < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: This study demonstrates sex-based differences in the vascular and endothelial responses to mental stress. The mental stress-induced reduction in endothelial function and increased double product seen in the females might manifest clinically as contributing to the pathophysiology of mental stress-mediated cardiovascular events in female patients and provide further information regarding the potential mechanism for sex differences in cardiac events.
Authors: Piero O Bonetti; Geralyn M Pumper; Stuart T Higano; David R Holmes; Jeffrey T Kuvin; Amir Lerman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-12-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Ilan S Wittstein; David R Thiemann; Joao A C Lima; Kenneth L Baughman; Steven P Schulman; Gary Gerstenblith; Katherine C Wu; Jeffrey J Rade; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Hunter C Champion Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-02-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: L C Becker; C J Pepine; R Bonsall; J D Cohen; A D Goldberg; C Coghlan; P H Stone; S Forman; G Knatterud; D S Sheps; P G Kaufmann Journal: Circulation Date: 1996-12-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Elizabeth A Martin; Rebecca E Nelson; M Donna Felmlee-Devine; Troy E Brown; Amir Lerman Journal: Cell Biochem Funct Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: Saralyn Mark; Graham B I Scott; Dorit B Donoviel; Lauren B Leveton; Erin Mahoney; John B Charles; Bette Siegel Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Elizabeth A Martin; Abhiram Prasad; Charanjit S Rihal; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-11-23 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Samaah Sullivan; Muhammad Hammadah; Ibhar Al Mheid; Kobina Wilmot; Ronnie Ramadan; Ayman Alkhoder; Nino Isakadze; Amit Shah; Oleksiy Levantsevych; Pratik M Pimple; Michael Kutner; Laura Ward; Ernest V Garcia; Jonathon Nye; Puja K Mehta; Tené T Lewis; J Douglas Bremner; Paolo Raggi; Arshed A Quyyumi; Viola Vaccarino Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Zainab Samad; Stephen Boyle; Mads Ersboll; Amit N Vora; Ye Zhang; Richard C Becker; Redford Williams; Cynthia Kuhn; Thomas L Ortel; Joseph G Rogers; Christopher M O'Connor; Eric J Velazquez; Wei Jiang Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-10-21 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Naomi M Hamburg; Murray A Mittleman; Petter L Ljungman; Elissa H Wilker; Mary B Rice; Elena Austin; Joel Schwartz; Diane R Gold; Petros Koutrakis; Emelia J Benjamin; Joseph A Vita; Gary F Mitchell; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 4.822