Literature DB >> 18850024

A crisis in chronic pain care: an ethical analysis. Part two: proposed structure and function of an ethics of pain medicine.

James Giordano1, Michael E Schatman.   

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a constructive approach to an ethics of pain medicine that is animated by a core philosophy of medicine as specific and focal to the uniqueness of pain, the pain patient, and the pain clinician. This philosophy of pain medicine 1) defines the nature of pain, 2) recognizes the variability and subjectivity of its expression in the pain patient, 3) acknowledges and explicates the vulnerabilities rendered by pain, 4) describes the inherent characteristics and asymmetries of the patient-clinician relationship, and 5) defines the ends of pain care. That these ends entail the provision of "good" care links the epistemic domains of pain medicine to its anthropologic focus and ethically sound conduct. We posit that an ethics of pain medicine should define the profession and sustain the practice. Facts establish (the need for) certain duties and rules of pain medicine. These emphasize the duty to self and others, and an appreciation for relational asymmetries, and dictates that those who enter the profession of pain medicine should be generally aligned with this set of core practical and ethical affirmations and duties. To maintain contemporary relevance, rules, duties, and moral reasoning must adjust to changing conditions. Applied ethics shape the practice within the infrastructure of core rules and duties of the profession. An applied ethics of pain medicine must be pragmatic, and therefore, cannot rely upon, or be reduced to, a single principle or ethical system. A number of ethical systems (such as the use of principles, utilitarianism, casuistry, feminist/care orientations) all have relative merit and potential limitations. We argue that the obligation to recognize ethical issues, and utilize knowledge to best reflect appropriate moral values rests upon the clinician as a moral agent, and therefore advocate the relevance and importance of an agent-based virtue ethics, recognizing that virtue ethics cannot stand alone, but must be employed within a larger system of ethical intuition. Yet, if such a structure of normative and applied ethics is to be realized, moral consideration must guide evaluation of the current system of pain care, and provide direction for the development and implementation of therapeutically and ethically integrative pain medicine for the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18850024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Physician        ISSN: 1533-3159            Impact factor:   4.965


  6 in total

1.  Ethical challenges and interventional pain medicine.

Authors:  Gary J Brenner; Karsten Kueppenbender; Jianren Mao; Jeffrey Spike
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-02

2.  Time for a unified approach to medical ethics.

Authors:  Shaheen E Lakhan; Elissa Hamlat; Turi McNamee; Cyndi Laird
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 2.464

3.  The American chronic pain crisis and the media: about time to get it right?

Authors:  Michael E Schatman
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  A glimmer of hope in American pain medicine?

Authors:  Michael E Schatman
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Ethical decision making in pain management: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Ana Sofia Carvalho; Sandra Martins Pereira; António Jácomo; Susana Magalhães; Joana Araújo; Pablo Hernández-Marrero; Carlos Costa Gomes; Michael E Schatman
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  A new paradigm for teaching behavior change: implications for residency training in family medicine and psychiatry.

Authors:  A Catalina Triana; Michael M Olson; Dorothy B Trevino
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.